Re: Telephone switch capacity -Reply
John D. Ervin <jervin@netpath.net> 11/03/95 05:32pm You would be suprised as to how much is being tapped now. You need to do a little more research before spouting off..
If the FBI wishes to set up a system that is capable of monitoring 1% of the total number of lines, that equates to a ability to tap 5%, not 1% of all calls in progress.
I am very confused. I was not 'spouting off' in any sense of the word. Your comment refers to my apparent lack of knowledge of the widespread practice of wiretapping. A practice, at least according to the sworn testimony of agents of the FBI, is not very widespread at all. That is, however, beside the point. I was making a very truthful comment about the engineered capacity of the telephone network in the U.S. I made no comment whatsoever about the current ability or desire of the FBI to tap into individuals telephone conversations. -=- Noah
[about the FBI supposedly wanting the ability to tap 1% of all phones in the US simultaneously] EPIC, CDT, and the original source confirm that they're talking about capacity, not total circuits. So what the FBI was asking for (not demanding, certainly not dicatating) by early 1999 (not Oct 1998, because the ticker starts at the end of the comment period) was between 0.25% and 1% of the 10-20% of lines that the phone system can handle at once, or between 0.025% and 0.2% of the lines. Of course the FBI doesn't have the staff to listen to all these lines, and they need an individual court order to authorize each individual interception, so this numbers game is a bit of a joke. There is no controversy about the number of wiretaps that have been authorized, except as manufactured by the Spotlight folks and other conspiracy loons. The EPIC FOIA request and lawsuit concerns the rationale for the FBI's capacity request. It all makes a little more sense now. I had been wondering what the hell the FBI had been smoking. Something not quite as strong as the stuff the Spotlight people are smoking, it turns out. The FBI proposal is still Not A Good Thing, and deserves your interest and opposition. See http://www.epic.org/privacy/wiretap/oppose_wiretap.html for facts and reasonable responses. The CDT's page, at http://www.cdt.org/digtel.html, is better. -rich
participants (2)
-
Noah Brodbeck -
Rich Graves