data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7973e/7973e05a405edaf65ed84a1861680feb7858686b" alt=""
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- (snip)
You don't have time to explain your beliefs, but you do apparently have the time to call me an idiot and, now, to tell me that I am intellectually dishonest. Since you don't know much about me, the best you can claim is that I am inconsistent. I am afraid I cannot accept an apology which is prefaced by an insult.
Get over it Red. Fine. I called your ideas idiotic. I called you intellectually dishonest. Admitedly ad hominem. Can we bypass it now?
I would not propose committing fraud. I do not understand who would
You already have.
If I wanted to I could repeatedly issue heart-wrenching stories of poverty in America (similar, of course, to politicians using "real world examples" in speeches). You seem to assume that this would be "wrong".
No, this is exactly what I've been asking for. In fact, I explicitly suggested that anecdotal evidence based on your experience would have value.
I try very hard *not* to simply apply my personal experiences to entire classes. I devalue personal stories when discussing policies and try, _try_ to examine facts.
No, the point I am making is that it should be legal to be unpleasant so long as you are minding your business. So, employment discrimination should be legal, but burning a cross in somebody's lawn is a shooting offense. (Preferably on the lawn in question soon after the defense.)
Some of us see little difference. Employment discrimination causes many social problems that you causally associate with personal flaws within the people affected. I place the blame on the people discriminating. You blame the people being discriminated against. Maybe there is a degree of blame to go around. (snip)
I generally favor governmental interference when somebody is not being left alone and is being interfered with in some way by others.
I am curious as to what governmental interference you do accept. (snip)
What puzzles me is that when I mentioned the failure of poor people to pursue these beneficial practices you said my comments were "idiotic". Now you appear to be saying that I was right, but that poor people lack the self-confidence to do these things. Please explain.
My belief is that poor people lack some of the resources to effectuate these practices. Among these are self-confidence as well as a perception of inability. Other reasons stem from the very discrimination that I have rallied against. You are "right" in that these practices can eliviate poverty if they are implemented (meaning that people have the will and means).
No, please tell me about your political philosophy. I am not asking which political party you vote for - I am more interested in why you vote for it.
Actually, i vote to maximize the influence that i have over public policy. That of course is not always consistent with my personal political philosophy. I could benefit from a remailer at this point and so my discussion must go .....
I am curious why people hire an African-American person in the first place if they are just going to fire them later. That doesn't make sense to me. (And, no, I am not being sarcastic, I would like to hear an explanation.)
Generally agency. Hiring is sometimes done by one department and discriminatory firing by another. The principle is held responsible. Sometimes it is direct. Employers may feel that hiring certain minority groups allows them to offer lower pay scales. Then when they have a bad day, they sometimes deal with their anxiety in illegal ways. In reality, I dont think racism can be reasoned away.
I think the personal harm is in the minds of your clients. If you are fired and your manager says "it's because you're black", this does not have to be depressing.
You are right that it does not have to. And to many it is not. To some it is. It is yet another obstacle to overcome. The obstacles do keep building up. The best way to deal with it is to train everyone to overcome it. I also favor other avenues to help.
I also fail to understand why anybody would want to work for a racist, even if you can force the relationship on the employer.
That often is the problem when it comes to remedy. No one wants to go back to work. You do your best to make whole, where no make whole relief can be found.
Red Rackham
Matt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMq+V2rpijqL8wiT1AQFT8QP/d01GTUu6640U4q/jqFPc2OH2qarWri6i B1GqvG23jZnJxAkJdO3uFy+krhwXYvXRIQORXXe0Y9fqMysib1Udh7de8PNlPyx0 3LjK/lOX/8I3sJTPV6IicCyM/Pwoj9bW20yCdcZDznOQjHTKHr7Q3AsPP9eGWMYw 3DgnVxhCSII= =3A+0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (1)
-
Matthew J. Miszewski