-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- The following message gave an error when I checked its signature! Chalk up another reason we should all be using the ASCII Armor option... Could someone check *my* sig and see if it's working?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I'm sure I'm missing something obvious here, but why are all these keyservers being forced to shut down? The possession of PGP *keys* should be perfectly legal, no? Or is the logic the same as that used to close down drug paraphernalia shops: if people are buying bongs, they must be smoking pot, and so we can't allow it?
And exactly what grounds does PKP have for suing? Is it because the servers themselves are using PGP, rather than just storing keys? What if a server is using a legal (ViaCrypt) copy of PGP? (Problem: this argument can only be used for DOS boxes currently.)
--Dave.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.2
iQCVAgUBLP+fvsfNklulBrsJAQGTCQP8DFF77E7zpB6nOzAwcLNbEgezVjt/yQTg DEtdmeY+hO9rcOUJoXwWMPbai2EhBHiyriAMYD5kcHrsbdiS99PW5A5kh4htaFDr Zrrkmn7KK0LXNL0fo2aJZVLKpiy9FxcJPmQvasTqe6EVltxbi4coTNR1wUoD5FE8 0sGj9AsGr+s= =2tQH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.3a iQCVAgUBLP+tJOyu9liBvjrdAQFClAQAsWulTDSCG6bE8tAa7YqcMpUvITEesB84 tRzNWHGcBxLRlsteaTj0V/n+N7Bs/jf0MhspPPdO/IpIuDa2IpEi43FLYFaCuBSa dnq6Sgn588kPvk0ATwpkGAapViIZBlA2c0TlSsQHgaH5tVd5RRqyZSrq1miEyBFH b0FhJ05hr7k= =7hn1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi. Due to the double-blind, any mail replies to this message will be anonymized, and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned. Please report any problems, inappropriate use etc. to admin@anon.penet.fi.
participants (1)
-
an4914@anon.penet.fi