Re: Escobar and Cellular Ph0n3z
I don't think encryption will go unnoticed for very long, one doesn't have to have a very high IQ to understand that secrecy is important, and that encruption is a technology which will help keep things secret. In Escobar's case, the thing to do would perhaps have been to hide an encrypted data stream in a normal-sounding conversation? This would be harder to detect for the authorities. The data would probably be text which would require much less bandwith than voice. Notice how our Prez referred to the killing of these two men as heroic and brave? It was two against THOUSANDS, I'm sure they shot him to pieces. :-) (No, I don't think drug use is anything but destructive but it's easy to see that TPTB speak with two (more more) tounges.) - Frode
For me, paranoia runs too deep. It's just too easy, too convenient an end to the story -- the Bad Man dead with no chance to implicate those who helped him. The gov't looks good, both at home and in the US; more money for the War on Drugz Escobar got out of jail once; he had no reason to fear going back to jail for a while. I'm betting that the body in that casket is not his, that this is his way of "retiring" from the game, and that he cut a deal with the gov't to do it. Note that his family was given protective custody by the gov't less than a week ago. We probably won't know the truth for years. --Alan
Frode Odegard said:
(No, I don't think drug use is anything but destructive but it's easy to see that TPTB speak with two (more more) tounges.)
Just to clarify one point.. no further discussion on the list, please, email me privately.. It's drug PROHIBITION that is destructive. It is drug PROHIBITION which made Escobar as rich & powerful as he was.
participants (3)
-
Alan (Miburi-san) Wexelblat -
frode@toaster.SFSU.EDU -
sameer@uclink.berkeley.edu