Remailers not heard from; info?
I'm curious if anyone knows anything about the status of the following type I remailers. NOT HEARD FROM IN MY JANUARY OR FEBRUARY TESTS amnesia@chardos.connix.com NOT HEARD FROM IN MY FEBRUARY TESTS pamphlet@idiom.com remail@c2.org remailer@bi-node.zerberus.de robo@c2.org And as long as I'm asking questions :-), I see that some remailers (hfinney@shell.portal.com, hal@alumni.caltech.edu, homer@rahul.net) preserve subject lines while others do not. Is this a readily settable option? If so, I'd like to commend it to other remailer operators. If not, I'd be interested in getting some sense of how difficult a hack it is. -- Bruce Baugh bruce@aracnet.com http://www.aracnet.com/~bruce
Bruce Baugh writes:
And as long as I'm asking questions :-), I see that some remailers (hfinney@shell.portal.com, hal@alumni.caltech.edu, homer@rahul.net) preserve subject lines while others do not. Is this a readily settable option? If so, I'd like to commend it to other remailer operators. If not, I'd be interested in getting some sense of how difficult a hack it is.
(Raph has authoritatively covered the space of deployed options already.) Writing code to keep or drop particular headers is trivial. Getting everyone who runs a remailer to deploy that code tends to be much harder. -Lewis "You're always disappointed, nothing seems to keep you high -- drive your bargains, push your papers, win your medals, fuck your strangers; don't it leave you on the empty side ?" (Joni Mitchell, 1972)
participants (2)
-
Bruce Baugh -
lmccarth@cs.umass.edu