Forwarded message:

Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 05:30:22 -0800 (PST) From: b!X <bix@geekforce.org> Subject: Re: IP: Clinton Wants Loophole In U.S. Free Speech Closed (fwd)

...

I'd say that 'shall make no law' is a clear as 'shall not be infringed' and pretty equivalent in meaning.

Same comments as before. Utiizing the text of the 1st to defend one's approach to the 2nd is nonrational, which is what the lame parody attempted to do, and what I was criticizing.

I'm not using the 1st to justify the second, all I'm saying is the two related phrases are equivalent within the context of the Constitution. It's semantics. Or are you saying that if you go slow enough it's as good as a stop? How slow is slow enough? ____________________________________________________________________ Lawyers ask the wrong questions when they don't want the right answers. Scully (X-Files) The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage@ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------