alt.cypherpunks.*, cypherpunks@*.*
I just got my news admin to add alt.cypherpunks. Unfortunately, I can't remember the names of the subgroups (which weren't added), and I deleted the mailings which listed them. If I remember correctly, they were along the lines of alt.cypherpunks.technical alt.cypherpunks.social alt.cypherpunks.announce alt.cypherpunks.ebonics :-) Sorry, couldn't resist! Did I miss any? Name-mangle? I also have listed the following alternate list hosts cypherpunks@algebra.com cypherpunks@cyberpass.net cypherpunks@ssz.com If anyone has a more complete list of hosts, I'd be happy for additions to the list. Thanks! ~ Patrick
Mullen, Patrick wrote:
alt.cypherpunks.ebonics :-) Sorry, couldn't resist!
Did I miss any? Name-mangle?
alt.cypherpunks.purebred-sovoks
I also have listed the following alternate list hosts
cypherpunks@algebra.com cypherpunks@cyberpass.net cypherpunks@ssz.com
If anyone has a more complete list of hosts, I'd be happy for additions to the list.
Dave Hayes was going to create one: Dave Hayes wrote: Dave> To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org, cypherpunks@toad.com Dave> Subject: Re: Moderation experiment almost over; "put up or shut up" Dave> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 12:29:41 -0800 Dave> Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com Dave> Precedence: bulk Dave> Dave> Ok. I'll "put up". Dave> Dave> If the cypherpunks will have me, -I'll- run the cypherpunks Dave> list. Those that know me know that I will *not* censor, moderate, or Dave> otherwise alter the content (other than the stuff majordomo does with Dave> "resend") of any messages to the list. and then wrote: Dave> To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org Dave> Cc: dthorn@gte.net (Dale Thorn), ichudov@algebra.com, cypherpunks@toad.com Dave> Subject: Re: Moderation experiment almost over; "put up or shut up" Dave> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 1997 13:13:40 -0800 Dave> Dave> Kent Crispin writes: Dave> > Dave is offering a single mailing list, which, while I am sure Dave is Dave> > a great person, still represents a single point of control and a Dave> > single point of failure. A distributed mailing list has a potential Dave> > for being much more robust, and for supporting a wide range of Dave> > viewpoints. Dave> Dave> I can also offer my participation in the distributed mailing list, if Dave> that is what it takes to get cypherpunks free of control interests again. I am not sure if it already exists... - Igor.
participants (2)
-
ichudov@algebra.com
-
Mullen, Patrick