RE: The great GAK crack (making GAK economically impossible) (fwd)
I believe that any denial-of-service attack will simply drive up the costs of licensing encryption programs and keys to the point that only corporations will be able to afford to release encryption products and purchase keys (in bulk). Remember, we have to pay them for the
privelidge
(not right) of communicating "securely".
If domestic GAK is mandated, my recommendation to my employer will be to not transmit anything via the Internet that we wouldn't want on the cover of The New York Times (or EE Times). As a U.S. subsidiary of a foreign corporation, I would not be surprised if our communications were decrypted and the contents passed along to our U.S. competitors if domestic GAK is mandated. (Can you say, "industrial espionage"? I knew you could.) ========================================================== Mark Leighton Fisher Thomson Consumer Electronics fisherm@indy.tce.com Indianapolis, IN "Their walls are built of cannon balls, their motto is 'Don't Tread on Me'"
Mark Leighton Fisher <fisherm@indy.tce.com> writes:
If domestic GAK is mandated, my recommendation to my employer will be to not transmit anything via the Internet that we wouldn't want on the cover of The New York Times (or EE Times).
Excellent advice. Perhaps you could get them to pass on your planned recommendations to the GAKkers in DC.
As a U.S. subsidiary of a foreign corporation, I would not be surprised if our communications were decrypted and the contents passed along to our U.S. competitors if domestic GAK is mandated. (Can you say, "industrial espionage"? I knew you could.)
I am positive your suspicions are correct. Adam -- Now officially an EAR violation... Have *you* violated EAR today? --> http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/ print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<> )]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`
participants (2)
-
Adam Back -
Fisher Mark