At 09:25 AM 12/4/95 -0500, John Young wrote:
12-4-95. W$Jabber:
"Microsoft Probe Spurs Subpoenas Tied to Internet. Antitrust Effort Appears Focused on Windows 95 Disabled Rival Software."
The subpoena issued to Netscape may be of particular significance. In the estimate of Netscape and industry observers,
I regularly use netscape on windows 95, and I conclude that this subpoena is pure, 100% harassment. --------------------------------------------------------------------- | We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/ and our property, because of the kind | of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald derives from this right, not from the | arbitrary power of the state. | jamesd@echeque.com
James A. Donald wrote:
At 09:25 AM 12/4/95 -0500, John Young wrote:
12-4-95. W$Jabber:
"Microsoft Probe Spurs Subpoenas Tied to Internet. Antitrust Effort Appears Focused on Windows 95 Disabled Rival Software."
The subpoena issued to Netscape may be of particular significance. In the estimate of Netscape and industry observers,
I regularly use netscape on windows 95, and I conclude that this subpoena is pure, 100% harassment.
I've heard that when a machine that already has Internet In A Box, Netscape Navigator personal edition, or some other internet software with a stack and dialer is upgraded to Win95, the win95 installation may somehow disrupt the functioning of the winsock or dialer. I've also heard that re-installing the application will solve the problem. I've never seen the problem myself, and don't know anything about any subpoena... --Jeff -- Jeff Weinstein - Electronic Munitions Specialist Netscape Communication Corporation jsw@netscape.com - http://home.netscape.com/people/jsw Any opinions expressed above are mine.
participants (2)
-
James A. Donald -
Jeff Weinstein