RE: Oxley Amendment
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/113d0/113d02ce55f629b5467a2790b7295caec811510d" alt=""
I agree that there should be *NO* rules about encryption... If the government wants to break encryption, buy the people who hack it and let them go just like every other good industrial country... M. -----Original Message----- From: Lucky Green [SMTP:shamrock@cypherpunks.to] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 1997 9:17 AM To: Michael Brock Cc: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net Subject: Re: Oxley Amendment On Wed, 24 Sep 1997, Michael Brock wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
I wonder if Mr. Solomon of NY will rethink his decision to not bring up SAFE without Oxley to the entire House after the unprecedented coaltion of companies and individual groups that came together to make sure that mandatory key recovery stays a "1984" like dream. I find it incomprehensible that one man, would block the introduction of this bill, after it being proved that this is what his constituents want....
What in the world makes you believe that Mr. Solomon's constituents would want SAFE to go the the floor? SAFE *must* be defeated, with or without the Oxley ammendment. -- Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to> PGP encrypted email preferred. "Tonga? Where the hell is Tonga? They have Cypherpunks there?"
participants (1)
-
Michael Brock