Re: Unmuzzy Explained
So is the idea beyond this that if file or a group of files were to be distributed over many computers (possibly hundreds or more) then none of the computers would be "responsible" for their content? I would think that any participant in the network would have to claim full responsibility for the content, assuming the file(s) could be accessed from any of the participating servers.
Okay. So what if serveral groups of computers, in public FTP directories, allowed anonymous ftp uploads of "parts" of a file that would be construde as bad content. The only way to assemble the file is to download several parts of it from serveral diffrent servers and assemble the file on your system. Thus the illegal file isn't illegal until its assembled. Sorta like switchblade knives. Lots of places can sell the parts legally, they just can't sell the assembled product. Would the servers that contain "parts" of the file be responsible for the content? (andr0id@midwest.net callsign: N9XLM) ( Computer Consulting & Management ) (P.O. Box 421 Cambria, IL 62915-0421) -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.2 mQENAzCsIi4AAAEH/1hb5+tO/n99Nbppf0ImLJ6AaVZ3NlZP0ZHwRQor00uA129i d4zWixNXxc8t2auaqN+asV99LpIip3/nQzBnjydiumeBdGLF2PR9+6X8X/RrqKa1 dVIukxM5Agg2eM6ih+0J38hgKJ3qzKXSz6sjYmpaxvbXZoHHOLUk/ZtHUKvvEyPw hnJEYnut8NUnIeK56lqeqRw86yoeRKymbfCdjdpgeY2aRwK2FJts8sbb7Fs10s4y jgxWIxIipBznbGUTh1hb2XrLGPENwk3E/qqXQJEsrySbtwdl6VgTVQjhDDEJMitL DYeiQ3W5EgxfcdbM1j2FwYu3P/dM6Y0I8xLMYT0ABRG0NmFuZHIwaWRAb2ljdTgx Mi5jb20gKG9pY3U4MTIuY29tIHN5c3RlbSBhZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yKYkBFQMFEDCs LO90C7R/GkJcSQEB01cH/0KC3sd+u4OxMku5378SJktoN6QIQYLJ7uVbuV4S51yK NAotCGf4Wl6wwjynzZvXKU0H87oDuMiq7FybgMNL2n+4bQIZi0iz0lIuzwoMDu63 NrHUW9Kz42pOnhrEhrdkHhHL9O5GgD1yc40fJ3qw5h7LQEjDxgypyw0IFILFc34u LeRLliNibxKp8JwAxXNHWSgxu28TQvmnkHi0AHP6tJ/uZYe+4dqJtrMMsYFjzZaz DPmxD+dzbTwlQKtJaP1ZkDI0Sr072wrZDv+G86GyGBMX2lpSafpRitnxuUttjU9o wsQ9Qo5xiH1nZRCs/bDzJe/gng+GHzevixDIITurtNA= =SgPT -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
So is the idea beyond this that if file or a group of files were to be distributed over many computers (possibly hundreds or more) then none of the computers would be "responsible" for their content? I would think that any participant in the network would have to claim full responsibility for the content, assuming the file(s) could be accessed from any of the participating servers.
Okay. So what if serveral groups of computers, in public FTP directories, allowed anonymous ftp uploads of "parts" of a file that would be construde as bad content. The only way to assemble the file is to download several parts of it from serveral diffrent servers and assemble the file on your system. Thus the illegal file isn't illegal until its assembled. Sorta like switchblade knives. Lots of places can sell the parts legally, they just can't sell the assembled product. Would the servers that contain "parts" of the file be responsible for the content?
PGP encrypting a file and putting it on an ftp site is unusable unless you have the key to unlock it.. in this sense the file is only partly on-line and therefore there would be no need to even split the file apart to various servers! Would the site containing this PGP encrypted data be responsible for it's content?
participants (2)
-
andr0id＠midwest.net -
Laszlo Vecsey