Survey: Police Satisfaction [CNN]
Forwarded message:
SURVEY SHOWS AMERICAN'S COMFORT WITH POLICE
police contact November 22, 1997 Web posted at: 7:01 p.m. EST (0001 GMT)
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A new Justice Department survey examining the way the public interacts with police has found that one in five Americans makes some kind of contact with law enforcement officers each year mostly to report a crime, ask for help or offer assistance.
The study, released Saturday, also found that less than 1 percent of people who made contact with police said officers used or threatened to use physical force. If force was used, most respondents said, their actions may have provoked it.
The survey reveals nothing surprising, criminal justice experts said. They said it shows that Americans are turning to police in situations beyond emergencies.
"I think to many people, the one in five number seems high. But it does emphasize the varied role police have as peace officers as opposed to just responding to crimes," said James Alan Fox, dean of the College of Criminal Justice at Boston's Northeastern University. "Most of the work police do is not necessarily respond to crimes."
However, some feel the survey fails to address factors important to relationships police have with citizens. police directions
"It probably doesn't really speak to the strained relations between the police and minority communities in America," said Arthur Lurigio, chairman of the Criminal Justice Department at Loyola University in Chicago.
The first-of-its-kind study was culled from data in the annual National Criminal Victimization Survey conducted by the Bureau of Justice Statistics.
According to the report, one-third of the contacts between the police and the public was related to seeking help or offering assistance. Another third was to report a crime, either as a witness or victim. Slightly less than one-third of respondents said the police had initiated the contact.
White males and people in their 20s were the most likely to have face-to-face contact, the survey found. Hispanics and blacks were about 70 percent as likely as whites to have interacted with the police.
The study was based on a survey of 6,421 people, age 12 and older, and used a sample of residents chosen to represent an entire population. No margin of error was given.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In <199711230158.TAA04577@einstein.ssz.com>, on 11/22/97 at 08:58 PM, Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com> said:
The study was based on a survey of 6,421 people, age 12 and older, and used a sample of residents chosen to represent an entire population. No margin of error was given.
6,000 people and that represents the whole country of +250 Million. Ahhh Statistics the Mathematics of Lies. - -- - --------------------------------------------------------------- William H. Geiger III http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0 Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail. OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html - --------------------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3a Charset: cp850 Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000 iQCVAwUBNHef6Y9Co1n+aLhhAQEqLgP/SKPdEdNDxpooE62y8P5t7dY/L6SPQerd IwLafV1Y9xHgHL2thmJ8TKpYa/+x/dLHBio2Gd0W/AiprTasHiIbXZsJ/nNerO1u AGn1To9xrxEtNpaPZd2qgLalkYnMeBCzN7uTBohO82cAIqYX93FC1itRmypQcaN2 wG7hqzvFIjI= =Qv+p -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Sat, 22 Nov 1997, William H. Geiger III wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In <199711230158.TAA04577@einstein.ssz.com>, on 11/22/97 at 08:58 PM, Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com> said:
The study was based on a survey of 6,421 people, age 12 and older, and used a sample of residents chosen to represent an entire population. No margin of error was given.
6,000 people and that represents the whole country of +250 Million.
Ahhh Statistics the Mathematics of Lies.
Statistics are used by scoundrels to impress fools. -Ben Franklin
At 8:11 PM -0700 11/22/97, William H. Geiger III wrote:
In <199711230158.TAA04577@einstein.ssz.com>, on 11/22/97 at 08:58 PM, Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com> said:
The study was based on a survey of 6,421 people, age 12 and older, and used a sample of residents chosen to represent an entire population. No margin of error was given.
6,000 people and that represents the whole country of +250 Million.
Ahhh Statistics the Mathematics of Lies.
The mathematics of sampling is well known, and is not the main source of "lies." The law of large numbers, tendency to the mean, etc., are the usual terms. It's perfectly plausible, and common, to use samples of a few thousand to get parameters (one of the few times this word gets used correctly) of a population of millions, or even billions. Bigger sources of lies are, of course, how questions are phrased. --Tim May The Feds have shown their hand: they want a ban on domestic cryptography ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, ComSec 3DES: 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Higher Power: 2^2,976,221 | black markets, collapse of governments. "National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In <v03102803b09d75ffa64e@[207.167.93.63]>, on 11/23/97 at 01:02 AM, Tim May <tcmay@got.net> said:
At 8:11 PM -0700 11/22/97, William H. Geiger III wrote:
In <199711230158.TAA04577@einstein.ssz.com>, on 11/22/97 at 08:58 PM, Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com> said:
The study was based on a survey of 6,421 people, age 12 and older, and used a sample of residents chosen to represent an entire population. No margin of error was given.
6,000 people and that represents the whole country of +250 Million.
Ahhh Statistics the Mathematics of Lies.
The mathematics of sampling is well known, and is not the main source of "lies." The law of large numbers, tendency to the mean, etc., are the usual terms.
It's perfectly plausible, and common, to use samples of a few thousand to get parameters (one of the few times this word gets used correctly) of a population of millions, or even billions.
It is common but it is bad science. As in this study there are too many factors that would affect the results of the survey for such a small sample size to be accurate. One of the biggest problems is the different results that will be acquired by taking samples for different groups. A sample group from say the projects in Chicago will give much different results than a sample group taken from say Lake Forest. Now multiply this "regional" effect several times for each group that will have a predisposition one way or another (pro or anti police). For a survey to have an accurate representation it needs to identify and sample from each of these groups to give an accurate overall picture. Lets say that you have decided on a sample size of 6000 and have identified 100 different "reginal" groups that you need to sample from. Your sample size is now down to 60/group and this is only on one factor of many that can cause your figures to be bias. Lets now say that you have discovered 10 key factors per group that need to be taken into account. Your sample size is now down to 6/group/factor. Not a very comforting sample size for developing an accurate "global" analysis. Now lets take into account things like how the interviewer presents himself to the subject being questioned. A officer wearing a uniform will get a different response than say someone in a teeshirt and bluejeans. Then you have the actual setting that the interview is taking place. Ask someone at the local bar what they think about the police and you will get one answer ask them at their office with their boss in the room and you will get a different set of responses. The single fact that there is another person there giveing the interview rather then say haveing the subject fill out a questionnaire privately will bias the results. Of course having mail in questionnaire has it's own set of problems as only a small fraction of the people will respond and the people that do respond may bias your results because of the reasons that they have for responding (You may have a disproportionate number of responses from people who feel passionately on the subject one way or another). Now that we have gotten through all of that we still have the survey itself. First you have to determine what questions to ask to find the answers that you are looking for. Not as easy as this may first seem (not to mention the issue of wether you are looking for the right answers). Then you have to worry about how the questions are phrased. Now you have to study what effects these will have on the various group/factors above. While one set of questions, phraseology, environment, and interviewer may result in an accurate result for one group a completely different set may be needed for another group.
Bigger sources of lies are, of course, how questions are phrased.
How the questions are phrased are only one of a large number of factors that influence the results of such a survey. Statistical Sampling is difficult enough in the real sciences (chem, bio, phy, ...) let alone the pseudo-sciences like psychology and sociology. Any such survey as the one here to be able to show an accurate picture could happen only by chance. More than likely they could have obtained more accurate results by sitting in a back room flipping a coin. - -- - --------------------------------------------------------------- William H. Geiger III http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0 Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail. OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html - --------------------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3a Charset: cp850 Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000 iQCVAwUBNHfwOY9Co1n+aLhhAQGOMwP+Mljo1dvhfObhvhAYbZuDHzLvRXVGkHDE CfnZyFPRcHdVCIZy4c2LBQqIPyOyix1bfwPZ9VtlVepCxlglUGCvti81if59FibR ivK9a+7yX5xq0weKlr36erMDlvJB80MVO6fggJlQtzSubQJQ2l1L0WtbKb7Eta2b XUjk38Ou3nI= =XBuY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (4)
-
Jim Choate -
Rabid Wombat -
Tim May -
William H. Geiger III