Subject: NSA Security Manual You realize, of course, that by posting the manual verbatim you have allowed them to discover where the leak was. They have the ability to change the wording slightly on every document, so that when you quote the document they can discover who gave it to you. That is why newspapers no longer report quotes from documents that they have, or never show pictures of secret documents. Then again, for something as simple as a manual, they may not bother to change each one. But the capability exists. user@host.domain.site
On Fri, 8 Apr 1994 anonymous@extropia.wimsey.com wrote:
Subject: NSA Security Manual
You realize, of course, that by posting the manual verbatim you have allowed them to discover where the leak was. They have the ability to change the wording slightly on every document, so that when you quote the document they can discover who gave it to you. That is why newspapers no longer report quotes from documents that they have, or never show pictures of secret documents. Then again, for something as simple as a manual, they may not bother to change each one. But the capability exists.
That only works for sensitive information that is likely to be leaked. The NSA doesn't do that for every FOUO and classified document it has - if it did, it'd never get anything else done, it'd be so busy doing that stuff. Even with software to do the synonym sonkey-work, it'd take a massive amount of work to print different copies of every single document the NSA has. I did find one interesting thing about FOUO documents mentioned, though - how can FOUO documents be exempt from the FOIA? That doesn't make sense, unless it was either a deliberate evasion on the part of the NSA to attempt to mislead the innocent and naive. Either a document is classified (and therefore subject to the standard classified document review process) or it isn't. Sorry, but they can't have their cake and eat it, too. Of course, I could be wrong. Their SPOs carry guns, too...
Subject: NSA Security Manual
You realize, of course, that by posting the manual verbatim you have allowed them to discover where the leak was. They have the ability to change the wording slightly on every document, so that when you quote the document they can discover who gave it to you. That is why newspapers no longer report quotes from documents that they have, or never show pictures of secret documents. Then again, for something as simple as a manual, they may not bother to change each one. But the capability exists.
user@host.domain.site
Been reading a bit of Tom Clancy, have we? This ability is undoubtedly possible, however, as (presumably) each individual employee has their own (individualized) copy, they should realize that some creative editing has been done by just comparing notes. BTW - this was posted in phreak-45 - so the damage was done quite a while ago - look in the papers for mysterious car crashes. MJH * * Mikolaj J. Habryn dichro@tartarus.uwa.edu.au * "Life begins at '040." PGP Public key available by finger * "Spaghetti code means job security!"
participants (3)
-
anonymous@extropia.wimsey.com -
Ed Carp -
Mikolaj Habryn