Husband/Wife jailed for saying Clinton SucksHusband/Wife jailed for say
Frankly, I'd rather have a president who didn't feel the need to be protected by thugs.
Well, wouldn't that require a president who had a clear conscience? I don't think we've had one of those since Eisenhower! -jcr
On Wed, 21 Aug 1996, John C. Randolph wrote:
Well, wouldn't that require a president who had a clear conscience? I don't think we've had one of those since Eisenhower!
you think Eisenhower had a clear concience??? think of all the nuclear testing that went on during his time in office... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ Nathan Poznick ^ ^ <npoznick@harding.edu> ^ ^ http://www.harding.edu/~npoznick ^ ^ ^ ^ "640k should be enough for anybody." ^ ^ ^ ^ --Bill Gates, 1981-- ^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
At 2:28 AM -0400 8/22/96, nathan poznick wrote:
you think Eisenhower had a clear concience??? think of all the nuclear testing that went on during his time in office...
... Which he did with a clear conscience. Cheers, Bob Hettinga ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com) e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "'Bart Bucks' are not legal tender." -- Punishment, 100 times on a chalkboard, for Bart Simpson The e$ Home Page: http://www.vmeng.com/rah/
On Wed, 21 Aug 1996, John C. Randolph wrote:
Frankly, I'd rather have a president who didn't feel the need to be protected by thugs. Well, wouldn't that require a president who had a clear conscience? I don't think we've had one of those since Eisenhower!
Eisenhower? That recent huh? Petro, Christopher C. petro@suba.com <prefered for any non-list stuff> snow@smoke.suba.com
participants (5)
-
Alan Horowitz -
John C. Randolph -
nathan poznick -
Robert Hettinga -
snow