Declan, perhaps the Big Brother vs. The Boss debate has been talked about for years in the crypto community but, as far as I can tell, it hasn't crossed over into the mainstream mediasphere. And that's partly due to the rhetoric of cyberlibertarians, who have consistently pointed their finger (justifiably most of the time) at the evil government, at the expense of seriously analyzing surveillance in the private sector. For example, how many people know what their company's security policy is? Do they read your email? How often and with what cause? I think any type of surveillance system is cause for concern--whether it originates from the government or IBM. Lastly, I think you overestimate the amount of wiggle room folks have in the labor market, which is never perfect. What happens when most of the Fortune 500 starts eavesdropping on company email? (Incidentally, I think that most working people--unlike the digerati--are not in a position to launch their own company.) It reminds me of the drug testing issue. Sure, it sucks and may even be unconstitutional, but that hasn't stopped a lot of companies from doing it. -Spencer (posting this from my the computer in my corporate cubicle) At 15:08 -0700 10/22/97, spencer_ante@webmagazine.com wrote:

But with this new product, I agree that they run the risk of alienating their core user group of cypherpunks and hackers. Encryption is a very complicated topic that doesn't lend itself well to sloganeering and histrionics. And one major thing that needs to be pointed out: PGP's key recovery system is *voluntary and private*--not mandatory and gov. controlled, which is what the Feds and Louis Freeh have been pushing for. One potential positive side effect of PGP 5.5 is that it could realign the crypto debate and force people to consider this question: Whose back door should netizens be more worried about: Big Brother or The Boss? Spencer, the folks on the cypherpunks list know better than perhaps anyone else that encryption is a complicated topic. I know it's tempting to search for New Things to Say about the crypto debate. I try it myself sometimes. But the question you posed about "whose backdoor should netizens be more worried about" has been debated for years and is hardly new. The short answer to it is: when Big Brother is my Boss, I have remedies. I can leave the company or pressure it to change policies. I can file a union grievance. If all else fails, I can leave the company and start my own. This is not the case when Big Brother is Louis Freeh or Janet Reno. When worldwide GAK is the rule, where else can I go? Also: governments have guns; governments have jails. They have unique coercive powers, which the law and western philosophical traditions recognize -- and try to limit. -Declan (posting this before a soccer game somewhere in virginia)