Re: Remailers and ecash (fwd)
Forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 17:37:58 -0400 From: ghio@temp0120.myriad.ml.org (Matthew Ghio) Subject: Re: Remailers and ecash
Anonymity is one thing which you cannot have without also giving it to others.
This isn't strictly true. I can send an email from an anon account to my friend Bob. At this point I know who I am, I know who Bob is, Bob knows who Bob is, *but* Bob doesn't know who I am. Clearly I obtained anonymity without anyone else gaining it. The only time that complete anonymity is obtained is if both sender and recipient are using anon accounts.
In order for a remailer operator to afford himself the benefits of anonymous communication by establishing and using a remailer, he must allow others to use the remailer also. This is why it is economical (for some people) to operate free remailers.
Well a single user is going to make traffic analysis a bit simplistic. Though this reducion to absurdity does serve to make a clear point about anonymity and traffic level. Clearly large traffic flows are required to maintane the anonymity for any usable length of time.
It has been suggested that it would be possible to increase the number of remailers by providing financial incentives to the remailer operators in the form of a small fee per message relayed. While that tactic might achieve its stated purpose, it would simeultaneously reduce the number of remailer users to those who were willing to pay the fee.
Only if the fee was something they would notice, milli-cent fees are not something most people will notice. I think you are unwittingly getting near the mark however. In short your comment about incentives to the operators, include in there the users and you have a winning combination. The question should be expanded thusly: What would motivate an average consumer to use an anonymous remailer? Clearly simple anonymity or writing nasty letters to Grandma anonymously are not going to motivate most folks irrespective of cost - they simply have no interest in such activities. So, the question becomes: What besides raising hell anonymously, laundering money, and defeating merchant purchase traffic analysis are commercial anonymous remailers good for?
Jim Choate wrote:
What would motivate an average consumer to use an anonymous remailer?
Clearly simple anonymity or writing nasty letters to Grandma anonymously are not going to motivate most folks irrespective of cost - they simply have no interest in such activities. So, the question becomes:
What besides raising hell anonymously, laundering money, and defeating merchant purchase traffic analysis are commercial anonymous remailers good for?
Okay, let's take a look at what remailers are actually being used for. Go to dejanews and type in the addresses of all the remailers you know of, count the number of posts to each newsgroup and add them up. Here are the top twenty newsgroups that I got when I did this little experiment: 10471 alt.anonymous.messages 7272 alt.test 6236 alt.hackintosh 4392 alt.binaries.mac.games 1326 misc.test 1253 alt.religion.scientology 1109 alt.sex.stories 1023 soc.culture.singapore 915 alt.amazon-women.admirers 877 soc.culture.iranian 770 alt.anonymous 622 fj.news.usage 573 alt.politics.nationalism.white 571 alt.sex.spanking 557 talk.politics.guns 543 alt.tv.real-world 518 alt.cracks 517 alt.drugs.pot.cultivation 512 alt.privacy.anon-server 498 alt.revisionism So what are remailers being used for? 1) Private communication in the form of anonymous message pools 2) Test posts 3) Discussion of Macintosh computers 4) Discussion of obscure religions 5) Sharing erotic fantasy stories 6) Avoiding censorship in Singapore 7) Avoiding censorship in Iran 8) Discussion of remailers themselves 9) Discussion of controvertial political topics (racism, guns, drugs) 10) Discussion about a TV show Note that this list does not include harassing Grandma, money laundering, and all your other delusional terrorist fantasies. Welcome to the real world.
Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com> wrote:
What besides raising hell anonymously, laundering money, and defeating merchant purchase traffic analysis are commercial anonymous remailers good for?
Avoiding spam. Anyone who doesn't use remailers is sure to get their mailbox full of crap. Employment related concerns. I know of many people on this list who have had problems along these lines. The rest of your comment is utterly stupid. How many people do you know who use remailers to launder money? Zero, I'd bet. You need to spend a little less time listening to mindless political rants and more time observing the real world.
participants (3)
-
ghio@temp0122.myriad.ml.org
-
Jim Choate
-
nobody@REPLAY.COM