Dave Emery writes:
There is also a newer technology called direct digital synthesis or DDS that works by accumulating phase (adding to the previous value)
We use DDS in some of our Microwave equipment between sites.
There is certainly little additional cost to building a trully secure digital cordless phone given the dense ASIC technology that is standard in this kind of product - but someone has to persuade the manufacturers that there is a real need and find a way to allow them to export the product.
I agree; but, if the information you are passing is truly that important just use a landline phone. Eliminate the possable "leak". I'm not claiming that a landline phone is secure, but your cordless is connected to it, so no matter how good your security is on the phone its no longer secure once it leaves the base station and enters the landline. Further encryption can be implemented but this requires equipment on both ends. Really aren't we trying to create the most secure methods of information exchange with the least amount of cost? I'm budget restricted so PGP and the internet are more secure and cheaper for me than most other means of comunication, so far. :) Dr0id (andr0id@midwest.net callsign: N9XLM) ( Computer Consulting & Management ) (P.O. Box 421 Cambria, IL 62915-0421) -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.2 mQENAzCsIi4AAAEH/1hb5+tO/n99Nbppf0ImLJ6AaVZ3NlZP0ZHwRQor00uA129i d4zWixNXxc8t2auaqN+asV99LpIip3/nQzBnjydiumeBdGLF2PR9+6X8X/RrqKa1 dVIukxM5Agg2eM6ih+0J38hgKJ3qzKXSz6sjYmpaxvbXZoHHOLUk/ZtHUKvvEyPw hnJEYnut8NUnIeK56lqeqRw86yoeRKymbfCdjdpgeY2aRwK2FJts8sbb7Fs10s4y jgxWIxIipBznbGUTh1hb2XrLGPENwk3E/qqXQJEsrySbtwdl6VgTVQjhDDEJMitL DYeiQ3W5EgxfcdbM1j2FwYu3P/dM6Y0I8xLMYT0ABRG0NmFuZHIwaWRAb2ljdTgx Mi5jb20gKG9pY3U4MTIuY29tIHN5c3RlbSBhZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yKYkBFQMFEDCs LO90C7R/GkJcSQEB01cH/0KC3sd+u4OxMku5378SJktoN6QIQYLJ7uVbuV4S51yK NAotCGf4Wl6wwjynzZvXKU0H87oDuMiq7FybgMNL2n+4bQIZi0iz0lIuzwoMDu63 NrHUW9Kz42pOnhrEhrdkHhHL9O5GgD1yc40fJ3qw5h7LQEjDxgypyw0IFILFc34u LeRLliNibxKp8JwAxXNHWSgxu28TQvmnkHi0AHP6tJ/uZYe+4dqJtrMMsYFjzZaz DPmxD+dzbTwlQKtJaP1ZkDI0Sr072wrZDv+G86GyGBMX2lpSafpRitnxuUttjU9o wsQ9Qo5xiH1nZRCs/bDzJe/gng+GHzevixDIITurtNA= =SgPT -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
I agree; but, if the information you are passing is truly that important just use a landline phone. Eliminate the possable "leak". I'm not claiming that a landline phone is secure, but your cordless is connected to it, so no matter how good your security is on the phone its no longer secure once it leaves the base station and enters the landline.
Argh.... Phones are ANYTHING but secure. Hence the STUIII & PGPphone. An encrypted rf link is far better than any POTS.... -- A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
participants (2)
-
andr0id@midwest.net -
David Lesher