arromdee@blaze.cs.jhu.edu (Ken Arromdee):

...

Rishab Aiyer Ghosh: As it so happens, hardly anyone here knew about Norton Encrypt so we got embroiled in this argument. If we were to adopt a consistently (and solely) moral stance, we would accept Detweiler's position that remailers are bad and should be banned because they can be easily misused.

There is a difference between believing that something is wrong (a moral stance), and believing that force should be used to stop it (a ban). A

"If it weren't for nitpickers, we'd all be knee-deep in nits." OK, what I meant of course was that we could adopt the _moral stance_ that remailer misusers (like misbehaving boyfriends) are reprehensible, and that therefore we should not discuss making remailers untraceable (or breaking Norton Encrypt) lest we inadvertantly help the Forces of Evil. OTOH knowledge about anonymous remailers (and the fallibility of Norton Encrypt) is _good_ for privacy - as I said, the latter was not discussed due to apparent technical ignorance. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rishab Aiyer Ghosh "In between the breaths is rishab@dxm.ernet.in the space where we live" rishab@arbornet.org - Lawrence Durrell Voice/Fax/Data +91 11 6853410 Voicemail +91 11 3760335 H 34C Saket, New Delhi 110017, INDIA