Re: Digital Watermarks (long, getting off-topic)

At 02:14 PM 7/24/96 +0200, Gary Howland wrote:
Timothy C. May wrote:
Pre-recorded DAT tapes were available for a while...they did not sell. I believe this was because DAT machine purchasers were sophisticated and new how to make CD-to-DAT copies, with or without SCMS.
Don't forget that pre-recorded DAT tapes are at least an order of magnitude more expensive to manufacture than CDs.
Isn't it odd that when music is sold, CD's are MORE expensive than cassette tapes, even though you _know_ that the manufacturing cost of CD's is less? Another oddity: The price for a blank, standard-quality videocassette is about the same as that of a blank, standard-quality audio cassette tape, despite the fact that the volume of tape included in the former is probably about a factor of 10 higher. Jim Bell jimbell@pacifier.com

[ No longer Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com ]
Isn't it odd that when music is sold, CD's are MORE expensive than cassette tapes, even though you _know_ that the manufacturing cost of CD's is less?
Perceived value-add of digital recordings (more faithful reproduction, longer life, etc.). It is assumed that, over time, such discrepancies will diminish as more competition show up. Meanwhile, you get effects like the Chinese "stealing" American intellectual property for a song. Ern
participants (2)
-
Ernest Hua
-
jim bell