Re: North CA cops skip preliminaries, get straight to torture
Tim May wrote:
At 7:59 PM -0700 10/30/97, Anonymous wrote:
#Subject: North CA cops skip preliminaries, get straight to torture
CBS news tonight showed cops in a northern CA town use swabs to apply "pepper spray" directly to the eyes of demonstrators in some Congressman's office. One cop administered headlocks, another pried eyelids open and a third administered discipline.
That's the ticket. Skip the judge and jury, just let the cops torture the perps. Why stop at pepper spray? Why not bamboo shoots? Electric shocks to the genitals? We must have order.
On the other hand, the perps were trespaassers in private offices. Me, I would've been inclined to fire up my Stihl and separate their little fairy circle at their wrists.
The manufacturer of the pepper spray used warns that it should be used from a minimum of three feet away, as closer use will result in tissue damage. Videos show the police spraying it directly in the non-violent demonstrators eyes from inches away. Naturally, even if they shot the non-violent demonstrators in the eye from inches away, with their guns, they would be provided with a taxpayer-supported legal team to claim that the officers were in fear for their lives from seated, handcuffed, unarmed, non-violent demonstrators. If I trespass on Tim's property, I would fully expect him to deal with me in a manner consistent with his declared intentions. I would expect the same from those who claim to be bound by the same rule of law that they _force_ on the citizens. This non-violent demonstrators were willing to accept the agreed upon punishment/cost of their actions in protest of the actions of their public servants. Their public servants, as usual, chose to to act in the manner of savages who are incapable of holding to the rule of law which they use to justify their confiscation of the citizen's right to bear arms in the face of tyranny. Twenty years or so ago, after seeing pictures of mothers and children in chains at a Livermore Labs protest, I wrote a song called "Don't Blame Me, I Voted For The Monkey." If more people had followed my example, we would be singing the praises of government, as Bozo sits in the Oval Office typing new legislation which would likely be far superior to anything we have seen in the last twenty years. "Time flies like an arrow...fruit flies like a banana." TruthMonger
At 9:14 PM -0700 10/30/97, Anonymous wrote:
This non-violent demonstrators were willing to accept the agreed upon punishment/cost of their actions in protest of the actions of their public servants. Their public servants, as usual, chose to to act in the manner of savages who are incapable of holding to the rule of law which they use to justify their confiscation of the citizen's right to bear arms in the face of tyranny.
Excuse me, but this modern notion that protestors get to "make a deal" about the fines they'll eventually pay is bogus. If they're trespassing, they're trespassing. They don't get to take over Intel's factory, chain themselves to the Evil Factory doors, and then make a deal to pay some token fine. Like the AIDS protestors who "arrange" a deal whereby they'll shut down the Golden Gate Bridge for several hours and then pay their arranged $50 tickets. Well, what's wrong with me driving up to the head of the sit-down protest and saying to the cops standing idly by, "Hey, there are some queers in the middle of the road, blocking my trip to Marin. If you're just gonna let em sit there for hours, putting my business and plans at risk, I'm just gonna gun my engine and drive right over their fairy asses." Crimes are crimes, not "guerilla theater." Not "performance art." (And I was one of the organizers of "Critical Smash," a counter-rally of truck drivers and fed up motorists who met the "Critical Mess" bicyclists planning to "shut down" major intersections.)
Twenty years or so ago, after seeing pictures of mothers and children in chains at a Livermore Labs protest, I wrote a song called "Don't Blame Me, I Voted For The Monkey."
I had a much better idea back then. Leave the mothers and childrens chained to the fences and gates. Pull back from them, erect a cordon around them, and block anyone from approaching. They wanted to be chained to the fence, sans keys, so let them have their wish. Others could show up to throw stuff at them, and place bets on who would be the last to die. And, as the flesh dripped off and the bones whitened, it might be a nice object lesson for the others. --Tim May The Feds have shown their hand: they want a ban on domestic cryptography ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, ComSec 3DES: 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Higher Power: 2^2,976,221 | black markets, collapse of governments. "National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."
participants (2)
-
nobody＠REPLAY.COM -
Tim May