Re: rhetorical trickery
At 02:36 PM 3/10/96 -0500, Mark M. wrote:
There was an article in the July 1995 issue of Technology Review by Dorothy Denning explaining the "evils of encryption" in defense of the Clipper Chip which mentions this case. I suspect that it actually happened.
Why should the fact that Dorothy Denning says something lead you to suspect that it actually happened? --------------------------------------------------------------------- | We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/ and our property, because of the kind | of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald derives from this right, not from the | arbitrary power of the state. | jamesd@echeque.com
jamesd@echeque.com writes:
At 02:36 PM 3/10/96 -0500, Mark M. wrote:
There was an article in the July 1995 issue of Technology Review by Dorothy Denning explaining the "evils of encryption" in defense of the Clipper Chip which mentions this case. I suspect that it actually happened.
Why should the fact that Dorothy Denning says something lead you to suspect that it actually happened?
Denning has happily talked about snuff films in the past. James is dead on that Denning is not a credible source. On the other hand, Phil Zimermann has personally told me of a case in which the police had trouble with a child molester using PGP in the stated manner. He is a credible source for this. Let us remember that just as murderers can use perfectly useful household knives to do their evil deeds, and we should not therefore ban cooking utensils, so it is to be expected that privacy tools would be used sometimes for evil as well as for good. A free society does not ban cars because they can be used to run people down, and does not ban PGP just because on rare occassions it is used to conceal the diary of a child molester. Perry
participants (2)
-
jamesd＠echeque.com -
Perry E. Metzger