Why put up with KRAP?
Why put up with KRAP?
[Network Associates] believes that although the Key Recovery Alliance is not in itself a political organization, membership in it has unintended political consequences that outweigh any technical benefits we may receive.
So, this piqued my interest. What technical benefits did NA receive from participating in KRAP? Did they get any? The press release says "may receive." All Newspeak aside, does this mean that there is a secret document promising the KRAP group something? (This is what remailers and brown paper envelopes were invented for. I'm sure John Young would be happy to scan in some KRAP promises.) If there is no secret document that comes out, we have to ask ourselves, why the alliance? Did these companies really see a market demand? Did the government make promises about size of contracts it would offer to companies that shipped them KRAP? (Perhaps this relates to farming subsidies...) If so, those companies would be well advised to talk to AT&T, whose promised contracts for shipping the TSD-1300 with Clipper in place of DES never materialized. Is there a plan for interoperable KRAP? Is this going to relate to interoperable SET, where competing impulses, competing comittees, and no clear threat model or design goal lead to a spec that isn't, and a need to go back to the drawing board? the simple fact is that cryptographic security is hard enough to achieve without trying to add in layers of KRAP. So why bother? Network Associates decided it wasn't worth it. This then, becomes an open call to the charter members of the KRAP: Apple, Atalla, Digital, Bull, HP, IBM, NCR, RSA, Sun, TIS, and UPS to explain what they're doing in KRAP, what they hope to achieve, and to follow Network Associates proud example, and get the hell out. I'll advise shareholders in any KRAP companyto ask that same question: Is there a reasonable ROI on the KRA, and why are you involved? The hall of shame is on the web: http://www.kra.org/roster.html -- "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -Hume
participants (1)
-
Adam Shostack