Re: Why are you bouncing my mail to Cypherpunks?
The antispam assholes suddenly blocked domain ix.netcom.com. (an amazing thing to do, all in all, and shows how far away from reality can people be carried out by religion) It turned out that sendmail at our mail relay site was ckecking their "blackhole DNS database". I deleted all the rules that refer to them and now things seem to be OK. I am sorry for your troubles, Bill. Thanks for letting me know. igor Bill Stewart wrote:
Hi, Igor - this bounced. Is it because I sent it as stewarts@ix.netcom.com instead of bill.stewart@pobox.com (which is how I subscribe, through cyberpass), or is RBL blocking Netcom again, or is something else wrong?
Thanks; Bill
Return-Path: <> Received: from dfw-ix13.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix13.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.13]) by ixmail7.ix.netcom.com (8.8.7-s-4/8.8.7/(NETCOM v1.01)) with ESMTP id KAA03312; for <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>; Mon, 4 May 1998 10:15:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost) by dfw-ix13.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with internal id MAA15308; Mon, 4 May 1998 12:15:32 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 12:15:32 -0500 (CDT) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@ix.netcom.com> Message-Id: <199805041715.MAA15308@dfw-ix13.ix.netcom.com> To: <stewarts@ix.netcom.com> Subject: Returned mail: Service unavailable Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
The original message was received at Mon, 4 May 1998 12:14:52 -0500 (CDT) from smap@localhost
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <cypherpunks@algebra.com>
----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to mail.algebra.com.:
MAIL From:<stewarts@ix.netcom.com> SIZE=1102 <<< 521 <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>... #blocked.contact postmaster 554 <cypherpunks@algebra.com>... Service unavailable
----- Original message follows -----
Return-Path: <stewarts@ix.netcom.com> Received: (from smap@localhost) by dfw-ix13.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id MAA15254 for <cypherpunks@algebra.com>; Mon, 4 May 1998 12:14:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pax-ca6-17.ix.netcom.com(199.35.217.209) by dfw-ix13.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id rma015185; Mon May 4 12:14:15 1998 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980504100635.008f7950@popd.ix.netcom.com> X-Sender: stewarts@popd.ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Mon, 04 May 1998 10:06:35 -0700 To: cypherpunks@algebra.com From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com> Subject: Forward: --India's INSAT hacked Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From Computer Underground Digest
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 11:06:30 -0700 From: Jeremy Lassen <jlassen@AX.COM> Subject: File 9--India's INSAT hacked
Space Age Publishing's India correspondent B. R. Rao reports that "hackers" have succeeded in stealing transponder time on board India's domestic communications satellite, INSAT. The Network Ops. Control Center(NOCC)of India's Dept. of Telecommunications is "...in the process of identifying the culprits".
The director of NOCC confirms that a reward has been offered to anyone who can provide information that helps identify the culprits. Reports indicate the NOCC is aware that "...anybody in possession of the technical details of INSAT and its frequency ranges can at regular intervals tap into its transponders and transmit data free across the globe."
I know this is rather vague, but I hadn't read about this anywhere else, and thought that the CUD's readers might find it interesting. Anybody need some transponders time? :)
Thanks! Bill Bill Stewart, bill.stewart@pobox.com PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF 3C85 B884 0ABE 4639
Thanks! Bill Bill Stewart, bill.stewart@pobox.com PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF 3C85 B884 0ABE 4639
- Igor.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In <199805050908.EAA02726@manifold.algebra.com>, on 05/05/98 at 04:08 AM, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home) said:
The antispam assholes suddenly blocked domain ix.netcom.com.
(an amazing thing to do, all in all, and shows how far away from reality can people be carried out by religion)
It turned out that sendmail at our mail relay site was ckecking their "blackhole DNS database".
I deleted all the rules that refer to them and now things seem to be OK.
I am sorry for your troubles, Bill. Thanks for letting me know.
Well in all fairness I filter out netcom.com messages (I do have an exception for Bill). With the exception of Bill's posts netcom is right up there with aol, compuserve, and a few others where if it's not spam it's some crap from the clue-impaired. - -- - --------------------------------------------------------------- William H. Geiger III http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0 Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail. OS/2 PGP 5.0 at: http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii/pgp.html - --------------------------------------------------------------- Tag-O-Matic: "Do your parents *know* you are Ramones?" - Ms. Togar -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3a-sha1 Charset: cp850 Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000 iQCVAwUBNU81wY9Co1n+aLhhAQEz9wP8CJhDiQ4wWkta6NrZbmZs35MkcLBJRo2j yHBiuJ7lhkTPNRs7RXOJQvD1e789D9tr0vmoWijY1TgZ8PfvwOFpL4cvRc3y3zRB v0I0RDg4KIy+KrTejzo6BDK6CrdxQkr/kPyOeQAs12p90c/Nj1kk7uMc+Z5AVZiz sE7WVterZe0= =OG6c -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
William H. Geiger III wrote:
at 04:08 AM, ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home) said:
The antispam assholes suddenly blocked domain ix.netcom.com.
(an amazing thing to do, all in all, and shows how far away from reality can people be carried out by religion)
It turned out that sendmail at our mail relay site was ckecking their "blackhole DNS database".
I deleted all the rules that refer to them and now things seem to be OK.
I am sorry for your troubles, Bill. Thanks for letting me know.
Well in all fairness I filter out netcom.com messages (I do have an exception for Bill). With the exception of Bill's posts netcom is right up there with aol, compuserve, and a few others where if it's not spam it's some crap from the clue-impaired.
_You_ can do it. _Cypherpuks@algebra.com_ cannot do it. - Igor.
participants (2)
-
ichudov＠algebra.com -
William H. Geiger III