A CC of my letter to Gelernter@cs.yale.edu
I caught your piece on the Op-Ed page. Of course I agree with you about the fact that there is a need for wiretaps. But I think that there are serious problems with the Clipper chip. It is very expensive compared to software only solutions and it is also very, very brittle. First the cost: * Every extra chip adds to cost, battery usage and pocket bulge. This is a heavy price to pay for something that could be done in software. Many of the next generation digital phones, for instance, use a DSP. There are more than enough spare cycles available to do encryption. * The high cost is effectively a tax on privacy for the average person. It is easy to imagine clipper chips adding $100 to the cost of an already digital phone, fax machine or computer. The poor are just as much targets as the rich. In fact, they are often easier targets because no one wants to bother chasing down a fake credit card transaction or bank account withdrawl if it only amounts to $75. If a chip was necessary, then it would be a different story. Software could help all of America, not just the rich. Now the Fragility: * The first generation of Capstone chips is already obsolete. They're worthless. All of the money that went into fabbing and producing them is gone. Why? Because the NSA discovered a weakness in the Secure Hash ALgorithm. They've fixed it now, but all the old chips are worthless. * Imagine that problems arise well after the chip is standardized. What will millions of Americans do? All of the digital phones, fax machines and modem cards will need to be replaced. * Now imagine that a pair of turncoats sell out America and put both halves of the key escrow on the black market. If we're lucky enough to discover this leak, it could easily take 6 months to a year to replace our now worthless phone system. * Software, on the other hand, is very easy to change. In many cases, the anti-virus programs travel faster than the viruses. These are the main reasons why I think that the Clipper is a boondoggle. Software based solutions would solve all of these problems _except_ the government's desire for a firm grip on the world and technology. -Peter Wayner
Peter Wayner writes:
* Imagine that problems arise well after the chip is standardized. What will millions of Americans do? All of the digital phones, fax machines and modem cards will need to be replaced.
Not that I don't agree with the basic premise, of course, but there's a similar risk to *any* consumer electronics implementation of a cryptosystem. Of course, in Clipper/Skipjack's case the problem is magnified by the fact that the stuff is kept secret, but the potential remains.
* Software, on the other hand, is very easy to change. In many cases, the anti-virus programs travel faster than the viruses.
However, a software-based consumer communicator will probably end up implying at least as much weight in people's pockets, and as much extra money, as Clipper. I don't think an economic argument will really fly well, though I'd love to be shown to be way wrong. Seems to me that a mass-produced chip whose production is subsidized by the government would probably be pretty cheap. -- | GOOD TIME FOR MOVIE - GOING ||| Mike McNally <m5@tivoli.com> | | TAKE TWA TO CAIRO. ||| Tivoli Systems, Austin, TX: | | (actual fortune cookie) ||| "Like A Little Bit of Semi-Heaven" |
Mike McNally says:
love to be shown to be way wrong. Seems to me that a mass-produced chip whose production is subsidized by the government would probably be pretty cheap. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Your tax dollars at work. Dave Otto -- dave@gershwin.jta.edd.ca.gov -- daveotto@acm.org "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!" [the Great Oz] GAT d++(-)@ -p+(---) c+++ l u++(-) e++/* m++(*) s-/+ !n h---(*) f+ g+++ w+ t++ r+ y++(*)
Dave Otto (the Wizard of TOTOSoft) writes:
Mike McNally says:
a chip whose production is subsidized by the government would probably be pretty cheap. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Your tax dollars at work.
True, of course, but looking at things as they are today a lot of my tax dollars are long gone into the pockets of the contractors and NSA people who did the design. A commercial product not using Clipper is at a disadvantage from the get-go. Seems to me this is already true, and short of exploiting the "investment gap" created in the Clipper project by the inherent waste and inefficiency of Government-driven projects, it'd be tough. Certainly, there's a tremendous marketing problem (which, I realize, our evangelism might help ameliorate). -- | GOOD TIME FOR MOVIE - GOING ||| Mike McNally <m5@tivoli.com> | | TAKE TWA TO CAIRO. ||| Tivoli Systems, Austin, TX: | | (actual fortune cookie) ||| "Like A Little Bit of Semi-Heaven" |
participants (3)
-
Dave Otto -
m5@vail.tivoli.com -
pcw@access.digex.net