In news.groups, Cipher <cipher@mindspring.com> wrote: * In article <62oshu$pov@news1.panix.com> Information Security, * The@NSA.sucks writes: * >To further rub in things, the UCENET II proponents are coming * >out with a "munging FAQ" that lists three times as many * >"reasons" not to munge versus to munge. * > * >What a bunch of assholes. * > * >On top of that, Mozena couldn't even state in plain English * >in the CFV for comp.org.cauce that it will require your * >real email address to post...it just kinda mumbles it * >while talking about robomoderation and tokens. * > * >Someone should give Mozena a hard kick in the balls. Let us give the anti-privacy, anti-munging, and anti-anonymity proponents a collective kick in the ass by voting against comp.org.cauce in its present form. To get a ballot and vote, send email to bostwick@cas.chemistry.gatech.edu and ask him for comp.org.cauce ballot. -- - Igor.