Had he posted it through a remailer, I think it would have been well justified. He was obviously blowing the whistle on what he saw as illegal activities.

The only reason that Keith could post NOTS 34 at all was because it had previously been posted to a.r.s anonymously. Prior to that, no-one outside of the Church had a copy of any NOTS materials(or so the Church says).

That's a much different matter than posting the entire NOTs series, though. The wholesale copying is what most people seem to object to, though my observations tell me that the "Church" objects to any copying, even for fair use...

Grady Ward got sued by the Church just because he _asked_ for a NOTS pack to be sent to him. The Church will do everything within its not inconsiderable power to prevent NOTS material being disseminated on the Internet - up to and including destroying the anonymous remailer network. Zed(hendersn@zeta.org.au) "Don't hate the media, become the media" - Jello Biafra PGP key on request