Re: Anonymous stock trades.
At 02:25 AM 6/8/96 +0200, Asgaard wrote:
Who is going to assure that someone has an ownership stake in the Humpback Whales? The World Government?
Brand them and herd them like open range cattle: The west did not need a government to do that, though they did need to hang a few folk who favored a different method of open ranging. --------------------------------------------------------------------- | We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/ and our property, because of the kind | of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald derives from this right, not from the | arbitrary power of the state. | jamesd@echeque.com
Normally I wouldn't comment, but: James A. Donald writes:
At 02:25 AM 6/8/96 +0200, Asgaard wrote:
Who is going to assure that someone has an ownership stake in the Humpback Whales? The World Government?
Brand them and herd them like open range cattle.
Branding whales? Um, what? -- Will (Maybe digitally signing whales might be more appropriate for this forum...)
At 1:15 AM -0400 6/9/96, jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
At 02:25 AM 6/8/96 +0200, Asgaard wrote:
Who is going to assure that someone has an ownership stake in the Humpback Whales? The World Government?
Brand them and herd them like open range cattle: The west did not need a government to do that, though they did need to hang a few folk who favored a different method of open ranging.
ObPrettyCrypto: Ah. Transponders. Could blind-sign 'em. Maritime specific-identity accounting. Trade 'em on the open market. Actual anonymous er, stock, ownership? Whale-meat futures on the hoof, er, fin?... Woah! Idea! Whale-watch tags? Anyone who comes within a 100-yards of them on the surface pays a nickle? This is brilliant! What a way to make Algore and all the treehuggers eat their own dog-food. (Ewwww! That was *really* crass, considering what "meat and meat byproducts" used to mean...) *That's* what all those marine biologists are doing out there in their Zodiacs! And *I* thought that they were doing research. Your tax dollars at work... ;-). All of which gives me a very Friedmanesque idea: a money-fence. With these "charging", heh, transponders, you could tag something you want to "protect", and charge micromoney based on your proximity-time with the object/plant/animal. The rarer the animal is, the more you charge. New meaning to the phrase, "you break it, you bought it." You touch it, you buy it? Sort of like financial defense-in-depth ala "The Mesh and the Net", or "Diamond Age". You could even build the transponders to "offload" micromoney to "rangers" (their owners, of course!) whenever they passed by... Okay, Okay. Enough already. I'll go take my Ritalin now... Oh. And, Phill? I'm still trying to deciding whether to refute your recent tractologicophilosphicus, but, in the meantime, how 'bout this for a terse version: I think you're ugly, and your mother dresses you funny. ;-). There. All that undergraduate philosophy (and beer!) at Missouri wasn't wasted. See, Ma? I invect, therefore I am. Cheers, Bob Hettinga ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com) e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "If they could 'just pass a few more laws', we would all be criminals." --Vinnie Moscaritolo The e$ Home Page: http://www.vmeng.com/rah/
participants (3)
-
jamesd＠echeque.com -
Robert Hettinga -
W. Kinney