Status of Cypherpunks list sites?
I've noticed that the list site name, "cypherpunks@toad.com", is still in use by many posters. I find it on most of the posts I reply to, and I have to manually change to one of the three current lists. Not too long ago I was subscribed to the "cypherpunks@algebra.com" address, and the list stopped flowing to me for a day or so. I resubbed under "cypherpunks@cyberpass.net." I noticed that Igor Chudov said he was taking a hiatus from the Net and lists, so I wondered if this meant his support for his site was either being dropped or might be subject to more frequent outages. Anyway, has anybody been doing any pings of the various lists to see which ones are most available and have the lowest latencies for redistribution to subscribers? And shouldn't we all be making a more serious effort to drop the use of the "cypherpunks@toad.com" address, as John said some months back that he would support forwarding stuff for a while, but not necessarily forever. As it is, it just adds another hop and another potential weak link. --Tim May There's something wrong when I'm a felon under an increasing number of laws. Only one response to the key grabbers is warranted: "Death to Tyrants!" ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay@got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Higher Power: 2^1398269 | black markets, collapse of governments. "National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."
On Tue, 19 Aug 1997, Tim May wrote:
Anyway, has anybody been doing any pings of the various lists to see which ones are most available and have the lowest latencies for redistribution to subscribers?
This would be interesting.
And shouldn't we all be making a more serious effort to drop the use of the "cypherpunks@toad.com" address, as John said some months back that he would support forwarding stuff for a while, but not necessarily forever. As it is, it just adds another hop and another potential weak link.
I think in principal this makes good sense. I am subscribed to toad and cyberpass under 3 or 4 names and I find toad is by far the quickest in turn around time to me. One thing of interest is that I was an early subscriber to cyberpass as apache@quux.. and I get that mail fairly promptly but under this nicks sub to cyberpass (much lower down on the list of subscribers) the latency is usually in hours (4-8) with discussions sometimes over before I read them, whereas my sub to toad is much prompter. I haven't done any statitics on this but I have been watching as the posts come in and procmail tosses them into various mailboxes.
On Wed, 20 Aug 1997, Apache wrote:
subscriber to cyberpass as apache@quux.. and I get that mail fairly promptly but under this nicks sub to cyberpass (much lower down on the list of subscribers) the latency is usually in hours (4-8) with
Well this post took 1.5 hours to turn around. In any case toad is in general much faster for me. Anyone else (besides JY) find this to be the case?
participants (2)
-
Apache -
Tim May