Re: Why I Pay Too Much in Taxes
At 8:05 PM 5/6/96, Duncan Frissell wrote:
However, are you controlling for level of income? The IRS is a lot more worried about TCMay committing tax fraud than they are about me committing tax fraud; my income taxes are a lot closer to 0 than his. -Allen
Actually, as a percentage of income, tax evasion is probably more prevalent among the poor than the rich. Because they are less exposed. Studies of spending show that the poorest 20% of Americans spend twice their reported income.
Indeed, I am extremely limited in how I can avoid complete traceability of my major income sources. Not rich enough to shelter income in a really big time way (and even these shelters are harder and harder to find...near-billionaire Justin Dart renounced his U.S. citizenship and became a citizen of Belize to avoid huge U.S. taxes). And too rich to "forget to report" income from mowing lawns, tips, freelance car body repair, etc. Caught right in the middle where the computers file reports automatically with the IRS."You can run, but you can't hide." By the way, as long as I've added another comment to this not-very-relevant thread (but one which has generated a lot of comments, so it's hard to hard folks aren't interested), I should mention that I left out the effects of INFLATION in my "60%" figure. To wit, imagine buying an asset (stock, real estate, etc.) for, say, $10,000 in 1982, selling it for $20,000 in 1995, and having to pay $3600 in taxes on this "gain," much of which was erased by the effects of inflation. (I don't have a convenient chart of the cumulative inflation over this period, but I'd guess it's between 60% and 90%. Meaning, a 1995 dollar is worth about half to two-thirds of a 1982 dollar.) Also, the effect of inflation has been to inflate salaries and thus inflate people into higher tax brackets, even when their "real wages" have not gone up. If we ever get really bad inflation again (>10% per year, as we had in the late 70s, early 90s), or, God forbid, hyper-inflation, the tax system will likely not survive in anything near its current form. --Tim May Boycott "Big Brother Inside" software! We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, we know that that ain't allowed. ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay@got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Licensed Ontologist | black markets, collapse of governments. "National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."
On Mon, 6 May 1996, Timothy C. May wrote:
By the way, as long as I've added another comment to this not-very-relevant thread (but one which has generated a lot of comments, so it's hard to hard folks aren't interested), I should mention that I left out the effects of INFLATION in my "60%" figure.
[...]
Also, the effect of inflation has been to inflate salaries and thus inflate people into higher tax brackets, even when their "real wages" have not gone up.
If we ever get really bad inflation again (>10% per year, as we had in the late 70s, early 90s), or, God forbid, hyper-inflation, the tax system will likely not survive in anything near its current form.
Section 1(f) of the Federal Income Tax Code provides: (f) Adjustments in Tax Tables so that Inflation Will Not Result in Tax Increases.- (1) In General.- Not later than December 15 of 1993, and each subsequent calender year, the Secretary shall prescribe tables which shall apply in lieu of the tables contained in [the tables which define the tax brackets] with respect to taxable years beginning in the succeeding calander year. (2) Method of prescribing tables.- [The tables] shall be prescribed- (A) by increasing the minimum and maximum dollar amounts for each rate bracket for which a tax is imposed under such table by the cost-of-living adjustment for such calender year, (B) by not changing the rate applicable to any rate bracket as adjusted under subparagraph (A), and (C) by adjusting the amounts setting forth the tax to the extent necessary to reflect the adjustments in the rate brackets. [deletions] This, at least, has been considered.
--Tim May
--- My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li "In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti 00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com
participants (2)
-
Black Unicorn -
tcmay@got.net