Cyberangels vs Anonymnity
Here's the section from the Cyberangel FAQ which should explain why I put the addresses on the list. Given that their main tactic so far is telling ISPs, I would guess that any unauthorized remailers may be in trouble... once they get a clue enough to spot them. Yes, the shouting is theirs. -Allen _9) WHAT KINDS OF CHANGES WOULD THE GUARDIAN ANGELS / CYBERANGELS LIKE TO SEE?_ A) WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE AN IMPROVEMENT IN USER IDENTIFICATION. USER ID IS IMPOSSIBLE TO VERIFY OR TRACE BACK. THE VERY ANONYMITY OF USERS IS ITSELF CAUSING AN INCREASE IN RUDENESS, SEXUAL ABUSE, FLAMING, AND CRIMES LIKE PEDOPHILE ACTIVITY. WE THE NET USERS MUST TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PROBLEM OURSELVES. ONE OF OUR DEMANDS IS FOR MORE ACCOUNTABLE USER IDS ON THE NET. WHEN PEOPLE ARE ANONYMOUS THEY ARE ALSO FREE TO BE CRIMINALS. IN A RIOT YOU SEE RIOTERS WEARING MASKS TO DISGUISE THEIR TRUE IDENTITY. THE SAME THING IS HAPPENING ONLINE. WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE USER ID MUCH MORE THOROUGHLY CHECKED BY INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS. ________________________________________________________________________ CYBERANGELS EMAIL ADDRESS: ANGELS@WAVENET.COM
participants (1)
-
E. ALLEN SMITH