Physician, Heal Thyself!
If I say I doubt this message will make into the "Approved By Sandy" list, it perhaps will, but my very mention of this may mean Fearless Leader will then chuck it into his Reject pile, but then.... Our Founder wrote: #Silly things happen when one responds literally to an obvious #metaphor. (see, "analogy.") See "sarcasm." Once again, Sandy flames, but calls it erudition. He uses sophistry to explain why *his* flames are actually just "corrections". #Nonsense. Richard may have read my response on the Unedited list #and Paul post on the Moderated list, but I sent my response to #Nope, wrong again. I referenced sophistry and hypocracy. I #leave the significance of the difference as an exercise to the #student. (Hint: one is an argument to the man, the other isn't.) More pointless sarcasm. This is the stuff Sandy would presumably dump into his "not fit for True Cypherpunks" pile, except that he wrote it, and so it is by definition approved. Utter hypocrisy. #And wrong yet again. Not a personal attack but commentary on #wooly thinking. Remember children, "If it comes from Sandy and appears to be a flame, it really isn't. It is just a comment on "woolly thinking."" #> One might wonder just what the rules of proper decorum are. #One might read my posts on this point and pay attention. And I urge our Enlightened Leader to take his own medicine. Stop flaming the list and calling it mere commentary. Xanthar -- --
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SANDY SANDFORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C'punks, On Wed, 29 Jan 1997, Anonymous wrote:
This is the stuff Sandy would presumably dump into his "not fit for True Cypherpunks" pile, except that he wrote it, and so it is by definition approved.
It was not approved for the moderated list. I sent my comments to the flames list where they belonged. (It went to the unedited list too, but that's fair game as well.) Sorry you didn't understand that.
And I urge our Enlightened Leader to take his own medicine. Stop flaming the list and calling it mere commentary.
So let me see if I've got this, this list should be open to all flamers EXCEPT me? Curious. At any rate, I am going to take anonymous' advice. I will largely refrain from addressing any of the garbage that ends up on the flame and spam lists. You guys are mostly just talking to yourselves anyway. Toodles, S a n d y ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On Wed, 29 Jan 1997, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SANDY SANDFORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C'punks,
On Wed, 29 Jan 1997, Anonymous wrote:
This is the stuff Sandy would presumably dump into his "not fit for True Cypherpunks" pile, except that he wrote it, and so it is by definition approved.
It was not approved for the moderated list. I sent my comments to the flames list where they belonged. (It went to the unedited list too, but that's fair game as well.) Sorry you didn't understand that.
And I urge our Enlightened Leader to take his own medicine. Stop flaming the list and calling it mere commentary.
So let me see if I've got this, this list should be open to all flamers EXCEPT me? Curious. At any rate, I am going to take anonymous' advice. I will largely refrain from addressing any of the garbage that ends up on the flame and spam lists. You guys are mostly just talking to yourselves anyway.
So how would you define a flame??? Seems more REASONABLE minds want to know????
Toodles,
S a n d y
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
participants (3)
-
nobody＠REPLAY.COM -
OKSAS -
Sandy Sandfort