(Fwd) Re: GUT and P=NP
Forwarding mail by: sondheim@panix.com (Alan Sondheim) on Sun, 24 Jul 3:39 AM -------------------
From fiction-of-philosophy-approval@world.std.com Sun Jul 24 04:08 EDT 1994 Reply-To: fiction-of-philosophy@world.std.com
I would say that an algorithm is also a rigidly constructed framework consisting of well-defined formula within a stabilized potential well; as such it has limited operability in situations which possess fuzzy heuristics - such situations would include ordinary-language parsing, by the way, if a theoretical full-accountability is to be given. Eliminating indeterminacy and `true randomness' is eliminating the lifeworld itself, with its fuzzy heuristics not always reducible to natural law, even of the trajectory-bundles of chaos theory. So we are thrown back to a quantum computer which is reduced in the quoted text as well to a theoretical positioning; this is suspect since such a computer also functions in the lifeworld. If the brain in Penrose's text functions as _a_ quantum com- puter, what is the source of the singularity (_a_)? It seems to me that there is, in the real, deep fuzziness all the way around. Are we dealing with a group of logicians who have ignored Schutz? I think so, _precisely._ Alan
participants (1)
-
John Young