Now that there is a new version of RIPEM available, what do you think of it? What do you think is the value in using it over PGP? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ..Christopher Allen Consensus Development Corporation.. ..<consensus@netcom.com> 4104-24th Street #419.. .. San Francisco, CA 94114-3615.. .. o415/647-6383 f415/647-6384.. ..Mosaic/World-Wide-Web Front Door: .. ..ftp://netcom7.netcom.com/pub/consensus/www/ConsensusFrontDoor.html ..
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
"Christopher" == Christopher Allen <consensus@netcom.com> writes:
Christopher> Now that there is a new version of RIPEM available, Christopher> what do you think of it? What do you think is the Christopher> value in using it over PGP? I am glad to see that the 'web of trust' model is spreading. However, I still see no reason to use ripem. 1) ripem is illegal for non-north-american users 2) ripem still uses DES 3) using ripem supports the notion that PKP holds some valid patents Linn H. Stanton <stanton@acm.org> The above opinions are exclusively my own. If anyone else wants them, they can buy them from me. Easy terms can be arranged. - -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.2 mQBNAitK8+EAAAECALzK83DH79m7DLKBmZA2h9U33fBE80EwT4xRY05K7WRfxpO3 BmhPVBmes9h97odVZ0RxAFvinOl4wZGOb8pDclMABRG0IUxpbm4gSC4gU3RhbnRv biA8c3RhbnRvbkBhY20ub3JnPrQnTGlubiBILiBTdGFudG9uIDxsc3RhbnRvbkBz aGVhcnNvbi5jb20+ =oCru - -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQBVAgUBLYd958GRjm/KQ3JTAQGZHgH/X5f3EuTOelU+yhy6rPbTNK+97JOEsETP MFw9KVf6NLc76nHKxToYla+WNY0em+m5jUKiEPhAj0o6KgP9HZplWA== -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (2)
-
Christopher Allen -
lstanton＠lehman.com