
Anonymous screamed:
Tim May writes: <stuff>
You admit here that you've said you hope to see D.C. nuked.
Do you really hope that D.C. gets nuked? Do other list readers agree? How many people would this kill? Over half a million live in the city proper, with millions more in the surrounding areas. You have now said that you would hope to see many of these millions of people killed.
Are you preparing this testimony for the trial, or for the press? I'd be more than happy to kick in some leftover plutonium for you to plant in Tim's home, if you plan on setting him up after I've finished my...uuhhh...home project.
It is this kind of support for depraved violence which has poisoned discourse on this mailing list. It is unconscionable to support such an act of cold-blooded terrorism.
Most of the "poison" seems to be coming from Tim's detractors, chief of whom is yourself, at present. Why don't you try limiting yourself to 10,000 words of ranting and finger-pointing for every "Nuke DC" statment Tim makes?
You're not even the worst. Other posters have supported this kind of sickening violence even more openly. No one complains. Apparently everyone with an ounce of moral sense has left the list long ago.
Please give the rest of us credit for being self-willed individuals who are perfectly capable of promoting our own brand of sickening violence, rather than just going along with the suggestions that Tim makes in our late-night secret meetings where we discuss the our plans for the overthrow of anarchy in the world.
You seem to think that the only problem with Waco is that the wrong innocents were killed. You have no problem taking out innocents in Washington D.C. if it lets you get at your enemies. You are no different from the agents who killed the men, women and children in Waco. You have no right to set yourself apart from them. You are as ruthless and violent as the worst of them.
As Robert Hettinga stated in a previous post, I think that your constant rants about innocent childen betray some kind of sick fixation on them. Please try to keep your hands away from your private body parts when thinking about them. That might help.
This list reeks of death and violence. Apparently there is no problem which can't be solved by killing. Kill the innocents of D.C. Kill the children in the day care center in Oklahoma City. Drop more bombs on Japan. Cheer the cold-blooded murder of a government agent. Kill the children who scrawl graffiti on your mailbox.
Boy, now I'm having problems keeping my hands away from _my_ private parts. Back in a minute... ...
Of course you have the right to post what you like. But when you spew garbage, I have the right to say it stinks. It seems that other posters have lost their sense of smell. They say that's what happens when you spend your time wallowing in sewage.
You seem to be the one both pumping most of the sewage and doing most of the wallowing in it. Of course, you're just groping around in it looking for 'bad' people, aren't you? It's not like you get cheap, vicarious thrills dwelling on these kinds of topics. When you testify in court, or give your interviews to the press, remember to keep your hands tucked in your armpits. Folding them together on your lap might prove to be too much of a temptation. TruthMangler BTW, thanks for those pictures of Princess Di's death scene that you sent me. Great closeups!

No one complains. Apparently everyone with an ounce of moral sense has left the list long ago.
Silence doesn't necessarily denote agreement, especially from someone (for example, me :) who avoids political posts altogether... ============================================================================ That stylometry thing (figuring out who wrote a message from its content) seems to be a big problem for people using remailers. Initially, I thought you could avoid it by using some software to tinker with your words. Although that can confuse some attacks, there are still author-dependent things you can't hide so easily. For example, someone with a sufficiently big sample of your writing (i.e., all a nym's public traffic) could measure, say, the number words per sentence, or how likely you are to use certain punctuation/function words, and use that to match it to something you wrote under your own name. And the measurement part isn't rocket science, either -- I slapped together a simple stylometer from basic UNIX tools (sed, sort, uniq, grep) and a calculator, and it appears to actually _work_. (In addition to being able to say two messages are by the same person, it looks like you can also tell a little bit about the author, but as for how much and what...?) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Randall Farmer rfarmer@hiwaay.net http://hiwaay.net/~rfarmer
participants (2)
-
Randall Farmer
-
TruthMailer