PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? -- is it usable?
Do you think that it is a good idea to migrate from pgp 2.6.3 to pgp 5.0 now? This message was automatically remailed. The sender is unknown, unlogged, and nonreplyable. Send complaints and blocking requests to <goddesshera@juno.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In <slrn67tug3.an.lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de>, on 11/28/97 at 05:06 PM, lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) said:
No.
Care to justify that? - -- - --------------------------------------------------------------- William H. Geiger III http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0 Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail. OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html - --------------------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3a-sha1 Charset: cp850 Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000 iQCVAwUBNH826o9Co1n+aLhhAQJt6QP/YqdAhhKkUQg3O3mQ75ppSGGQV+LV21i3 BP0BbTu9dNtvxhlfgVP6qAQnGew+xINN+LfWQNceXgwjGcuHuMJl/NG6pQzYrQLE h5y7pA6A5e4IRAqX5XxpvPFkiD4mS0CstbdeKetZBOs4HmOHMR4EYpGUpxY2pX7C Mc1ckCEoIgs= =3PD1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (3)
-
goddesshera＠juno.com -
lutz＠belenus.iks-jena.de -
William H. Geiger III