-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In article <ac7db05202021004bc61@[205.199.118.202]>, tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May) wrote:

...

If I'm reading this correctly, if I Photoshop a kids face onto the body of the latest Playboy centerfold, I'm in violation of this proposed law?

I believe there have already been prosecutions along these lines. For example, do you think a _comic book_ with child porn themes ("explicit" art, situations) would not be prosecuted as child porn?

I strongly suspect that a _painting_ of a 7-year-old girl engaged in a sex act would result in a prosecution.

Any cites? - -- - -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred. - --- [This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the signature and forwarded.] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: Gratis auto-signing service iQBFAwUBMFjEkSoZzwIn1bdtAQFO5gGAvKEwd8DuWbNAzMtkqQ4BCPrp5YAOWrcu eSooY922jvZlXV+PYFcamevbR3mZ4bYj =Jxeu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----