Re: Mandatory Voluntary Self-Ratings
From: IN%"reagle@mit.edu" "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." 9-MAY-1996 20:02:59.66
I would agree the questions seem too video game orientated, and I don't like some of the questions either. However, it is a fair effort, and I
I will also give them credit for a fair effort. However, it's one that can stand a _lot_ of improvement... like all the rest.
I'm sure this is something that could go on for a very long time in some cypherpunk thread (something I'm not interested in argueing about), but there is no such thing as a perfectly objective or unbiased system. For
I will be interested in seeing a response from the admin address I cc'd it to.
instance, I don't like the distinctions other systems make for homosexuality, but I also understand some parents may wish to screen on it...
I understand why parents may wish to screen on it; I still disapprove of giving them the ability to do so. Am I in favor of governmental or other coercive suppression of systems that do so? No, not at all. But I still will do my best to discourage them - such as by not rating or mis-rating pages. -Allen
participants (1)
-
E. ALLEN SMITH