To: cypherpunks@toad.com S >Child pornography is not protected speech, and challenging S >child pornography laws is not currently on EFF's agenda Didn't the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decide that the transport and sale provisions (unknowing posession) of the federal kiddie porn law were unconstitutional? Wouldn't a warning like yours risk converting unknowing to knowing posession. Duncan Frissell --- WinQwk 2.0b#0