Re: ADMIN: proposed new policy on the mailing list
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- What's the point of resorting to contrived inducements to include signatures? If there's a real reason to do it, people will, and if not, they won't. Perhaps we could just all by-and-large agree to sign posts? I'll start with this one... -- Will -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.3 iQCVAgUBLMpmVvfv4TpIg2PxAQHrlAP5AaRssrPAO/sNsBkPVGKcJbn5z9exBlqd JqG9nfx5HuinNFANovpGO5+zDp0fDtnQ4c1e86vsONQ3wSklXZx30IYG/h7cX4T9 rXNpxZVsT26lIHIrAxEXKBCRwhtlaO19+G1nN5DLChXF/DlnQiTRsmjxhPI1NI5r 9WyyI02GEDk= =xy8S -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I personaly like this non-standard way to sign posts, cut out the lines in the header, wrap them with the apropriate PGP gubbish, and check it as a detached signature. j' -- O I am Jay Prime Positive jpp@markv.com 1250 bit key fingerprint = B8 95 E0 AF 9A A2 CD A5 89 C9 F0 FE B4 3A 2C 3F 524 bit key fingerprint = 8A 7C B9 F2 D5 46 4D ED 66 23 F1 71 DE FF 51 48 Public keys by `finger jpp@markv.com' or mail to pgp-public-keys@pgp.mit.edu Your feedback is welcome, directly or via symbol JPP on hex@sea.east.sun.com
participants (2)
-
jpp＠markv.com -
W. Kinney