Dimitri Vulis wrote:
Lame losers who call themselves "cypher punks" and bend over for John Gilmore.
It is obvious that you, Dimitri Vulis, intend to be disruptive to the operation of this list. I have politely asked you several specific questions about your motives. I am politely asking you again, Dimitri Vulis, why are you unwilling to rationally and politely discuss whatever grievances you have with specific Cypherpunks? I believe you are capable of rational discourse, you allegedly have some academic credentials so you must have a passing familiarity with formal debate. Why are you unwilling to join this discussion with anything other than immature insults? If the facts are on your side, a reasonable demeanor can only enhance your arguments. If the facts are not on your side, why can you not graciously admit you are wrong and withdraw your accusations. I have been unfailingly polite to you. Do you have it within your character to respond to me in kind? Thank you for your attentions to this matter. Logos out
logos wrote:
Dimitri Vulis wrote:
Lame losers who call themselves "cypher punks" and bend over for John Gilmore.
It is obvious that you, Dimitri Vulis, intend to be disruptive to the operation of this list. I have politely asked you several specific questions about your motives.
Sorry for the noise, but could Logos be specific as to the fallacy in each item he/she is addressing? I thought that was the purpose of the Logos character.
In <Pine.BSF.3.91.961204070229.25120B-100000@blacklodge.c2.net>, on 12/04/96 at 07:15 AM, logos <logos@c2.net> said:
I have been unfailingly polite to you. Do you have it within your character to respond to me in kind?
<sigh> Good 'ol Dimitri :) What can be said other than Dimitri is Dimitri. He has a long and colorfull history of this childish behavior not only on the cypherpunks list but is well know on many of the UseNet Newsgroups. You may also note that many of the more "colorfull" anonymous postings are of the same format and most likely can be traced back to our good doctor. -- ----------------------------------------------------------- whgiii@amaranth.com -----------------------------------------------------------
logos <logos@c2.net> writes:
I have been unfailingly polite to you. Do you have it within your character to respond to me in kind?
Do you think spelling my last name "Vilus" is polite? --- Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps
logos <logos@c2.net> writes:
Dimitri Vulis wrote:
Lame losers who call themselves "cypher punks" and bend over for John Gilmore.
It is obvious that you, Dimitri Vulis, intend to be disruptive to the operation of this list. I have politely asked you several specific questions about your motives.
Hmm, I looked at my mailbox and haven't found any questions.
I am politely asking you again, Dimitri Vulis, why are you unwilling to rationally and politely discuss whatever grievances you have with specific Cypherpunks? I believe you are capable of rational discourse, you allegedly have some academic credentials so you must have a passing familiarity with formal debate. Why are you unwilling to join this discussion with anything other than immature insults? If the facts are on your side, a reasonable
I've been participating in this discussion for a considerable period of time before being attacked by Tim May for no apparent reason (other than his hatred for Jews and for immigrants). I tried unsuccessfully to convince him off-list that his attacks are off-topic and false (he attributed to me various bizarre stuff that I never said). Since he insists on continuing his attacks on my character, I will point out that he's a liar and a racist. --- Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps
participants (4)
-
Dale Thorn -
dlv＠bwalk.dm.com -
logos -
whgiii＠amaranth.com