Re: anonymous video rental store
it is illegal for video stores to disclose rental records anyway.
I believe the law was passed quickly after a reporter obtained a list of videos rented by a Supreme Court nominee (or some other nomination that must be approved by congress). In the particular case, there was nothing that the most sensitive, politically correct, family-values-affirmin' [okay, that's enough] person would object to. But, congress passed a law within weeks, presumably because they didn't want their rentals scrutinized. I wonder whether the list of books checked out at public libraries is public information...[eh, nothing dicey there anyway, except Howl]. This shows how reactionary and patch-work oriented the legal system is. A Simple Way to Rent Anonymously, but not cheaply:: buy the tape for cash and then sell it when you are done. This could cost 60% of the retail price, but you get the tape for almost any length of time. Audio CDs are effectively "rented" in this way, with the 60% cost being average. Paul E. Baclace peb@procase.com
I can state with some certainty that most libraries will not reveal their check out records. Several years ago the FBI went around to several college and city libraries and asked for copies so they could track 'suspicous' people. As far as I am aware every library refused on the grounds that what a person reads is nobodys business but their own. Apparently the FBI (and presumably other agencies) would have to go to a judge with some kind of probably cause and request a court order. The engineering library at UT Austin used to have it under the glass at the check out desk.
participants (2)
-
Jim choate -
peb@PROCASE.COM