(No, I see no relevance for "coding in C," but even critics of "off-topic" posts have commented on this, so I will too, especially as how physics was my old career and in 1974 I interviewed with a Santa Barbara company doing ICBM geogravitic trajectory work.) At 5:50 PM 8/20/95, Sandy Sandfort wrote:

I can see why the folks at Ft. Meade would be hinkie about such measurements being made around them. No need to hypothisize micro-singularities or anti-gravity experiments. Occam's Razor in action.

I can't. At least not with regard to microgravity measurements. If you mean missile trajectory stuff, this is extremely implausible. A missile targetted at Fort Meade is not going to be deflected by more than a few centimeters (if that much) by nearby variations...the missile is moving very fast and there's little "integration time" for slight errors in trajectory to build up. (Also, but related to this, the closing trajectory is near vertical, so it's doubly hard to imagine local g-field anomalies affecting the point of impact.) As to what the folks were doing with their equipment, I have no idea. Maybe measuring water tables in and around the Chesapeake Bay (only a few miles from the Fort). The NSA people probably were upset with the equipment itself, not the idea that Meade was being more precisely targetted for ICBMs. --Tim May ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay@got.net (Got net?) | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero 408-728-0152 | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Corralitos, CA | black markets, collapse of governments. Higher Power: 2^756839 | Public Key: PGP and MailSafe available. "National borders are just speed bumps on the information superhighway."