pro-crypto govt. people
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b39aa/b39aabc6c5a912153cd769106a0ac39641e21aae" alt=""
This year I recall seeing 1 former prosecutor saying that widespread encryption was good and/or that GAK was bad, and 1 military or former military person of fairly high status saying that GAK was bad. Circa 1994-5 I also recall a military or retired miltiary person of rank reporting that very widespread crypto would be a boost to national security. We could really use these people's, and similar people's, words in pro-crypto efforts. Unfortunately, disk problems a while back cost me most of my old mail, including all of these saved items. If anyone has them and/or knows who these people are, please let me know. -- Stanton McCandlish mech@eff.org Electronic Frontier Foundation Program Director http://www.eff.org/~mech +1 415 436 9333 x105 (v), +1 415 436 9333 (f) Are YOU an EFF member? http://www.eff.org/join
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f86/87f86230ac79038dbf812fc585df9b4ebc80ef9c" alt=""
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- regarding ranking military personnel and/or prosecuters who were in favour of encryption and anti-GAK, the key issue is former -while in rank or in the DOJ they follow the party line --and they _know_ what the abuses are. I know more than a few, but they a) wont talk about it, b) are ex-spooks (if there is such a thing), and c) item 'b' makes them not good testimonials anyway. just get a list of generals retiring in the last 5 years from the Congressional record since there is a rank pension retirement requirement --survey. likewise, Bill Clinton fired every single on of the U.S. prosecuting attorneys when he took office in 1993; same thing: survey 'em. some career DOJ types who were pretty pissed and not likely to view anything Bubba and F{ree,uck} are pushing with approval. bet you come up with some positive answers. if nothing else you might get some quotes; and some the retired generals were pretty crusty. check the man who retired as head of the army 160th deep black spec ops group --swore in public, his troops never wore regulation, beards, etc. and I think General George S. Patton IV retired a couple years ago with at least 2, maybe 3 stars. they're out there; get a grunt to get on with the research. on or about 971016:1200 Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org> was purported to have expostulated to perpetuate an opinion: #This year I recall seeing 1 former prosecutor saying that widespread #encryption was good and/or that GAK was bad, and 1 military or former military #person of fairly high status saying that GAK was bad. Circa 1994-5 I also #recall a military or retired miltiary person of rank reporting that very #widespread crypto would be a boost to national security. We could really use #these people's, and similar people's, words in pro-crypto efforts. #Unfortunately, disk problems a while back cost me most of my old mail, #including all of these saved items. If anyone has them and/or knows who these #people are, please let me know. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: latin1 Comment: No safety this side of the grave. Never was; never will be iQBVAwUBNErSurR8UA6T6u61AQGkNQH6AlxB6oJ9OJa2dtSB07jCXVZZdUIvdntR plzqvee5RGCtjZaqrc8VksmunVaMh3FOHpHGJW+rcwSoMK0Qs9ASnQ== =OAtn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8837f/8837fa75733a525045e1f4321dd68c5ce1f6f6f5" alt=""
Andrew Grosso is the former prosecutor. I've also been chatting with Bruce "I wrote the CDA" Taylor to see what his views are, but I suspect he'll fall into line with his pals at the DoJ. Last week after a TV show I was telling Donna Rice-Hughes about how crypto can protect against stalkers, but I don't know if she understood my argument. Others will be able to suggest many more people, I'm sure. I'm still frazzled from my trip. Yesterday I was wandering around Chile's socialist museum; the day before I was climbing an active volcano in the south. //yawn// -Declan At 12:00 -0700 10/16/97, Stanton McCandlish wrote:
This year I recall seeing 1 former prosecutor saying that widespread encryption was good and/or that GAK was bad, and 1 military or former military person of fairly high status saying that GAK was bad. Circa 1994-5 I also recall a military or retired miltiary person of rank reporting that very widespread crypto would be a boost to national security. We could really use these people's, and similar people's, words in pro-crypto efforts. Unfortunately, disk problems a while back cost me most of my old mail, including all of these saved items. If anyone has them and/or knows who these people are, please let me know.
-- Stanton McCandlish mech@eff.org Electronic Frontier Foundation Program Director http://www.eff.org/~mech +1 415 436 9333 x105 (v), +1 415 436 9333 (f) Are YOU an EFF member? http://www.eff.org/join
------------------------- Declan McCullagh Time Inc. The Netly News Network Washington Correspondent http://netlynews.com/
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72690/7269003d57f6de03576d7c0caacdf4dba0e9b749" alt=""
At 4:23 pm -0400 on 10/16/97, Lizard wrote:
At 04:08 PM 10/16/97 -0400, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Last week after a TV show I was telling Donna Rice-Hughes about how crypto can protect against stalkers, but I don't know if she understood my argument.
Stick to words of one syllable. Hmmm... "If you make words hard to read, bad men will not find you."
It seems to help if she's sitting on your lap... Cheers, Bob Hettinga ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com), Philodox e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/ Ask me about FC98 in Anguilla!: <http://www.fc98.ai/>
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bfbc/5bfbca8df985fc1873fb939cb241c9a6a576727c" alt=""
At 4:23 PM -0400 10/16/97, Lizard wrote:
At 04:08 PM 10/16/97 -0400, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Last week after a TV show I was telling Donna Rice-Hughes about how crypto can protect against stalkers, but I don't know if she understood my argument.
Stick to words of one syllable. Hmmm... "If you make words hard to read, bad men will not find you."
Try that. :)
No, put it in terms she understands: "If you make embarassing words impossible to read, no one will be able to read them on the front page of national newspapers." Best-- Glenn Hauman, BiblioBytes http://www.bb.com/
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2578/e257838f69594b655f568322d43c7e864ca1d2ee" alt=""
At 04:08 PM 10/16/97 -0400, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Last week after a TV show I was telling Donna Rice-Hughes about how crypto can protect against stalkers, but I don't know if she understood my argument.
Stick to words of one syllable. Hmmm... "If you make words hard to read, bad men will not find you." Try that. :)
participants (6)
-
Attila T. Hun
-
Declan McCullagh
-
Glenn Hauman
-
Lizard
-
Robert Hettinga
-
Stanton McCandlish