Okay, so I'm very new here. Got a nickel? Here's three cents change... First, if you look to the posts, the Detweiler connection/accusation did not stem from the name being used. Cyber-stalking (combo of net-stalking and physical stalking) has been documented, and I seriously doubt that anyone that belongs on this list would object. More specificly, how can Nobody get upset about Sue? The connection/accusation _did_ arise, however, when the text of the post was analysized. The Clinton/North post greatly enhanced the connection. Once the connection was made, the system started looking for "collateral" evidence, and found some. Some words to "Sue": If you have, in fact, been the subject of stalking, physical, net, or cyber, please accept my appologies on behalf of all honorable males for failing to properly limit the number/range of these monsters. If you wish to avoid being connected to Detweiler, limit your posts accordingly Specifically, don't philosophize about 42 unless it has a strong crypto/ privacy slant. Don't post conspiracy info unless it has a strong crypto/ privacy slant. In fact, avoid ALL posts that don't have some/privacy slant. Most of us have many other things to do, and since this list does around 300 posts per week, many are annoyed at best by off-topic posts. This explains the reason for the "Go Away" responses. As for threats to the remailer that posted Detweiler, why not just recylce the threat? A and B threaten C, C routes A to B and B to A. More to the point, this is the fronteer, and most of us are learning. eg: Ambulance-chasing spammers get mail-bombed. Sounds like appropriate Justice to me. Now, _I_ better quit before someone suspects _me_. Nathan Zook When Senator Hatch supports any Clinton nominee great guns from the get go, worry.