RE: atheism (was: RE: Democracy... (fwd)) (fwd)
17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
Jim Choate wrote:
As I've demonstrated before (and for the last time):
^(A) = (^A)
f() = belief function A = hypothesis ^ = not f(^A) != ^f(A) At least not without placing requirements on f(). Then you claim everything is a belief, so f() is meaningless. But then you deny A == A when you claimed that metaphysical objectivity is a belief, so what was the point in writing the equation in the first place? Go transcend. Matt
7593
Age (days ago)
7593
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Matthew James Gering