Hmm, I though Rich Graves was a Nazi, but now the Nazis reject him too. :-) Message-ID: <012317Z28071996@anon.penet.fi> Path: ...!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!news.eunet.fi!anon.penet.fi Newsgroups: alt.fan.ernst-zundel,alt.revisionism,news.groups,alt.internet.media-coverage,news.admin.net-abuse.misc,c2.chat,alt.cyberpunk,soc.culture.jewish From: an572010@anon.penet.fi (Vyshinsky) X-Anonymously-To: alt.fan.ernst-zundel,alt.revisionism,news.groups,alt.internet.media-coverage,news.admin.net-abuse.misc,c2.chat,alt.cyberpunk,soc.culture.jewish Organization: Anonymous forwarding service Reply-To: an572010@anon.penet.fi Date: Sun, 28 Jul 1996 01:21:24 UTC Subject: Re: Spammed by a Nazi obssessive References: <schwartz-2507960756390001@cmh-p091.infinet.com> <joelr.3533.000B045C@winternet.com> <4t8nk8$3ic@Networking.Stanford.EDU> Lines: 80 [multi-mailed to llurch@stanford.edu, postmaster@stanford.edu, and postmaster@c2.net] llurch@stanford.edu writes:

joelr@winternet.com (Joel Rosenberg) writes:

...

In article <schwartz-2507960756390001@cmh-p091.infinet.com> schwartz@infinet.com writes:

...

Maybe someone should mention to Ingrid that this little crap works both ways. She may have been spammed, so are we.

Sara

I got the same spew, and sent back a message, with a copy to the root, that I want no further email from these folks. No big deal.

Right. It's not.

It doesn't work both ways. Neither way is acceptable. Fortunately, with the exceptions of Skippy, Giwer, and Marduk, whom nobody loves, nobody seems to be into continuing net abuse after they've been notified that it's wrong.

You, postmaster@c2.org, postmaster@stanford.edu and news.admin.net-abuse.misc were notified about forged cancels by you against others. Did you stop since? Your practice of posting to a lot of newsgroups with a followup-to line for an "enemy" newsgroup, is the classic practice of trolling. Most of the newsreaders wont see the rebuttals, and presume that your post was unchallenged, so inspiring a rebuttal with the same arguments that have already been made. You've not stopped regardless of the number of complaints. Your practice of forging your e-mail address away from your true e-mail address is also net abuse. This is an obvious taking advantage of sameer@c2.net, a net hero, the admin of your ISP, that you are maliciously taking advantage of to avoid complaints of your actual e-mail address, llurch@stanford.edu, whom you work for. Whoever "Skippy" is, she has not forged cancels since March 1996, and has never done the other abuses you deal out in prolific quantity. Are you going to stop these three net abuses because of yet another complaint? You haven't before. --****ATTENTION****--****ATTENTION****--****ATTENTION****--***ATTENTION*** Your e-mail reply to this message WILL be *automatically* ANONYMIZED. Please, report inappropriate use to abuse@anon.penet.fi For information (incl. non-anon reply) write to help@anon.penet.fi If you have any problems, address them to admin@anon.penet.fi