Ya won't have complete equity amongst lobbyists, until ya remove the power of bureaucrats to control people's lives. When laws can be used to deprive people of their livelihood, via either taxation or regulation, you will create situations where people can make money from it, and therefore unscrupulous people will take advantage. The only defensible argument for government at all is to protect people from depredation, either from fellow citizens or from external threats. When you prevent people from engaging in peaceful commerce, you open the floodgates to tyranny. Thus, the solution is less government, not to try to legislate human nature. Kurt [speaking for myself, of course] ---------- From: Richard Huddleston[SMTP:reh@wam.umd.edu] Sent: Monday, December 18, 1995 6:12 To: jimbell@pacifier.com; vznuri@netcom.com Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com Subject: Re: Political Cleanup program Detweiler wrote: * >JB: * >>Politics is traditionally corrupt, it appears, because donors to politicians * >>and political campaigns expect a quid pro quo for their donations. Various * >>unsatisfactory solutions include campaign spending limits, etc. * > * >I have an unusual view that I've never seen elsewhere: the problem with * >our government is not that money or PACs are involved, but that the system * >does not handle or resolve the conflicts between them very well. in other * >words, in contrary to the current view that all PACs are evil, I think the * >problem is not that we have PACs, but that our current system does not * >balance their demands in some sensible manner. the system is * >susceptible to corruption. it is conceivable however that there would be * >a system that involves money and politics but still avoids corruption. Not to sound like a dupe or anything, but every time I get discouraged at the rampant mealyism of our political system I go read the first couple of paragraphs of a text from GOVT 101. There, I get reminded that the way most political debate is handled elsewhere is with bullets. Personally, I welcome a complete equity between all lobbyists seeking to obtain a politico's ear. Take the money out of the equation, and let the merits of their causes, if any, stand on their own. Happy holidays, Richard