The modem tax never left...
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> To: politech@vorlon.mit.edu Subject: http://cgi.pathfinder.com/netly/opinion/0,1042,1869,00.html
The NotReally News ReportWhore informs us:
* * * Is the "modem tax" back? FCC Commissioner Susan Ness said on Monday that ISPs might have to pay so-called universal service charges that help subsidize cheap rural phone service and school and library Internet connections.
Declan, Something that Republican children of the post-JFK generation all remember is where they were when George Bush said, "Read my (moving) lips...No New Taxes!" The great tragedy of their times, though they still fail to recognize it even today, is that the citizens present at that occassion did not rush the stage and drag him to the nearest tree with a limb strong enough to hold his weight when a rope was thrown over it and attached to his neck. The sticky PrePubescizens of the WebGeneration will someday regret that their parents stood by and didn't even bother watching as the Analogue Lies of the Controllers were transformed into Digital Lies suitable for implant into the brains of the Robotizens, via the infrared wave emission capabilities of TeleTunnelVision and JavasCrapGraphics. I know that you make your living in the Belly of the DCBeast, so you don't want to slay the Monster Who Lays The Golden Eggs, but couldn't you at least try to make sure that the Monster gets a little of the Bad Eggs it is hurling at the Flockizens on its own face? How about some headlines such as: "Lying Piece of DC Shit Claims Hands-Off Internet Policy" "Arrogant Thieves Expect Victims To Believe They Won't Shake Down NetUsers." "Armed Terrorists Fake Retreat To Draw Victims Into Ambush."
* * * Some excerpts from Commissioner Ness' remarks:
"Local telcos complain that data calls typically last much longer than voice calls, tying up switches and requiring the addition of more capacity in the loop and the central office.
And this is True (TM)? Are there any real reporters left in the media who are capable of analyzing the Claims (TM) being made by those promoting Facts (TM) meant to serve their own-self interests? (Not a 'crime', but neither should it be a 'gimme.') Is their anyone in the techno-reporting industry who is capable of including an analysis of the claims of various players in the game of Buy The Pot? Are any of those reporting on the Telecos' claims capable of informing those with a limited knowledge of the technology involved if the analog and digital signals being discussed are comparable in terms of the 'burden' that they place on the Telecos, or if InterNet service would be more efficient or competitive if put into the hands of other communications infrastructures? If the local Telecos are finding themselves 'burdened' by InterNet traffic, then perhaps they should share that terrible burden with Cable Companies, and other entities who would like a chance to compete for the InterNet business which is currently in the dictatorial grip of the Regulators Who Feed At The Teleco Trough. I expect that I can find the answers to the questions I have about these matters by reading a mountain of information from various sources, and then distilling it down to manageable proportions suitable for analysis. It seems to me that if the media is not providing that type of service to me, then I might save myself time by accessing the original 'press releases' by various government and corporate entities, and not have to wade through mountains of media 'news' which adds little to what was handed to them on a silver platter for advertising/disinformation/promotion purposes. ~ ~ Toto ~ ~ "The Xenix Chainsaw Massacre" http://www.clas.net/~dave/public/xenix "WebWorld & the Mythical Circle of Eunuchs" http://www.clas.net/~dave/public/webworld "InfoWar -- The Digital Revolution" http://www.clas.net/~dave/public/infowar3 "Space Aliens Hide My Drugs" http://www.clas.net/~dave/public/sahmd
participants (1)
-
Toto