Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list

17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
Dale Thorn wrote:
1. The subscribers have spoken by staying put, or, 2. The subscribers are so lazy and unaware of what's going on that they've just left things as is.
Now, in my opinion, we've come to this: Some people here will hold the optimistic view of the bulk of the subscribers, and others will hold the pessimistic view (the bulk will presumably be in-between).
In case of 2, they are probably not worthy of your help. - Igor.
7868
Age (days ago)
7868
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
ichudov@algebra.com