On Tue, 1 Mar 1994, Anonymous wrote:

There's been a lot of discussion lately about trying to make stego files not have any identifying marks, so that usage of stego would be indistinguishiable from noise. A more effective option might be to insert obvious (or somewhat obvious) stego messages in lots of graphics. Take every graphic file you own and hide something in it with a stego program. Put PGP messages in them (even including the obvious ---- BEGIN PGP MESSAGE ---- headers). Or a BBS ad. Or just cute little messages. Then distribute the files that way. Hopefully, people will take these images and pass them on without ever knowing there was stuff in them. If enuff people do this, graphics will become so "polluted" with stego messages that your truly secret PGP messages will be hidden in plain sight along with all the other graphic files full of stuff, and won't stand out. Plus, you could plausably deny having put it there, claiming that it must have been that way when you got it, and that you didn't know it was there.

This goes along one of the more cute ways of annoying any snooper on your lines. If you periodically send noise over a suspicious line, you will give the people who are trying to monitor you a great headache. This is one of the tactics that you can use to foil any attempts to crack your communications. Then again, wouldn't it be weird if the noise you sent over actually decrypted into something intelligible? This says something about 'noise'. I know that it takes an incredible amount of mathematics to prove, but there must be a way to separate what is truly random noise, from that which appears to be. The calculations to crack this are probably more expensive than the information it contains, so it is hence uneconomical. But still, it makes me wonder. _ . _ ___ _ . _ ===-|)/\\/|V|/\/\ (_)/_\|_|\_/(_)/_\|_| Stop by for an excursion into the-=== ===-|)||| | |\/\/ mud.crl.com 8888 (_) Virtual Bay Area! -===